Author: dmitriy.vasyura@gmail.com

  • Pokrovsk to be cut off from gas supply from 12 December because of Russian offensive

    Pokrovsk to be cut off from gas supply from 12 December because of Russian offensive

    Due to Russia’s invasion and the escalation of the situation in the city of Pokrovsk, Donetsk Oblast, natural gas supplies to the population will be cut off.

    Source: Donetskoblgaz, a Donetsk Oblast gas supply regulator, on Facebook

    Details: The message says that due to the escalation of the situation associated with Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, natural gas distribution in the city of Pokrovsk will be suspended from 12 December.

    Donetskoblgaz stressed that in recent months, despite constant attacks and Russian offensive operations, its specialists have been doing everything possible to provide Pokrovsk residents with natural gas.

    However, the situation has now escalated to such an extent that it has become extremely difficult to supply the citizens who remain in the city. The company also stressed that due to significant damage to gas pipelines and constant Russian attacks, it is impossible to deal with the consequences of combat actions in the gas distribution system and restore gas supply to customers.

    Quote: "If possible, we ask Pokrovsk residents to turn off the gas taps on gas appliances and on the gas pipeline to the appliances. People from residential areas of the city are asked to turn off the shut-off device on the gas pipeline to the house."

    Background:

    • Analysts at the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) suggested in a report on 8 December that the Kremlin was likely to continue its attempts to capture the city of Pokrovsk in Donetsk Oblast, despite significant human and material losses.
    • The ISW stressed that the Russians had recently been advancing much faster than in the whole of 2023, and had not abandoned their intention to capture the entire Donetsk Oblast.
    • Back in August, Serhii Dobriak, Head of Pokrovsk City Military Administration, said that all services and facilities were working in Pokrovsk. But he predicted that they would have to stop working soon.

    Support UP or become our patron!

  • G7 leaders are ready to support the new Syrian government

    G7 leaders are ready to support the new Syrian government

    G7 leaders are ready to support the new Syrian government

    The G7 countries have expressed their readiness to support the new Syrian government after the change of power. A key condition for support is the observance of human rights and respect for religious and ethnic minorities.

    Representatives of the Group of Seven (G7) countries hope that the opposition that has come to power in Syria will respect human rights and religious and ethnic minorities.

    Transfer UNN from the posilannam to Bloomberg.

    The G7 will support the transition process in Syria after the fall of Assad.

    The leaders of the group of seven countries are ready to support the new Syrian government if the transition process takes place with respect for the rule of law, as well as for religious and ethnic minorities in the country.

    The association hopes that " all opposition groups seeking to participate in the governance of Syria will demonstrate their commitment to the rights of all Syrians." This is stated in the draft statement, which the G7 plans to publish later this week.

    recall

    Turkey opens the Yayladagi checkpoint on the border with Syria for the return of migrants.

    Former Idlib Development Minister Muhammad al-Bashir has been appointed head of the Syrian transitional government.He has already held meetings with the leader of the KHTS and the former Prime Minister of the Assad era to form a new cabinet.

    Israel launches large-scale strike in Syria: tanks approach DamascusDec 10 2024, 07:32 AM • 13048 views

  • Explosions heard in occupied Donetsk Oblast city, Russian proxies announce evacuation

    Explosions heard in occupied Donetsk Oblast city, Russian proxies announce evacuation

    Explosions heard in occupied Donetsk Oblast city, Russian proxies announce evacuation

    Russian occupation authorities in the Donetsk Oblast city of Yenakiieve announced evacuations from some areas on Dec. 10 amid reports of explosions.

    Local Telegram channels shared footage that purports to show explosions in the town, with authors speculating about a possible missile attack. A blurred video published by the Tipichny Donetsk Telegram channel captures what seems to be multiple secondary explosions.

    Ukraine has not officially commented on the incident.

    Russian occupation authorities in the city did not clarify the reasons for the announced evacuation, claiming that the situation was "under control."

    No further details on possible consequences have been provided at the time of the publication.

    Yenakiieve, a mining and metallurgy center and the birthplace of Ukraine's former pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, has been occupied by Russia since the start of its aggression in 2014.

    Ukrainian forces have repeatedly targeted Russian military facilities across the occupied territories after Russia unleashed its full-scale invasion in 2022.

    0:00/1×
    Footage that purports to show the aftermath of an explosion in Russian-occupied Yenakiieve, Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine, on Dec. 10, 2024. (Tipichny Donetsk/Telegram)
    Once liberated Kupiansk braces for worst as Russian troops approach, and future Western support looks uncertainVolodymyr paused his Sunday stroll from a shopping center in Kupiansk to take pictures of rubble from a Russian strike that almost killed his wife late last month. “It was broad daylight when they struck,” he said. “Our only luck was that my wife was in the kitchen, soExplosions heard in occupied Donetsk Oblast city, Russian proxies announce evacuationThe Kyiv IndependentBoldizsar GyoriExplosions heard in occupied Donetsk Oblast city, Russian proxies announce evacuation
  • Pokrovsk will be cut off from gas supply on December 12

    Pokrovsk will be cut off from gas supply on December 12

    Pokrovsk will be cut off from gas supply on December 12

    DONETSKOBLGAZ suspends natural gas distribution in Pokrovsk due to significant damage to gas pipelines and constant shelling. Customers are asked to turn off gas taps on appliances and gas pipelines.

    Starting December 12, gas supply to houses in Pokrovsk, Donetsk region, will be cut off due to constant shelling by the Russian Federation . This was reported by Donetskoblgaz, according to UNN.

    Due to the aggravation of the situation related to the full-scale invasion of the Russian Federation, the distribution of natural gas in Pokrovsk is suspended from 12.12.2024

    – the regional gas company said in a statement.

    It is noted that due to significant damage to gas pipelines and constant enemy attacks, it is impossible to eliminate the consequences of military operations on the gas distribution system and restore gas supply to subscribers.

    Residents of Pokrovsk were asked to turn off the gas taps on gas appliances and on the gas pipeline to the appliances. Subscribers of the private sector need to close the shut-off device on the gas pipeline-the entrance to the House.

    Shocking drone footage: military shows what Toretsk looks like nowDec 10 2024, 12:08 PM • 8055 views

  • Man United secure not one but two spots in the rundown of top 10 2024 sh*tshows

    Man United secure not one but two spots in the rundown of top 10 2024 sh*tshows

    Spurs coach Ange Postecoglou, Manchester United co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe and England's Kyle Walker

    Who has made just the biggest mess of 2024 as a whole? There are obvious embarrassments at Spurs and Manchester United, but let England not be forgotten.

    It is right that we find ourselves considering 2024’s greatest footballing sh*tshows at a time when especially Tottenham but especially Manchester United are sh*t-showing at their spectacular best (worst?) – but they are far from alone in having soiled the football bed this year.

    There really has been a lot of sh*t on show.

    10) The churning mid-table shod sh*tshow
    This is very harsh on certain teams, because the vast mid-table morass currently clogging up the Premier League by definition contains a combination of over-achievers, under-achievers and… achievers. But it’s still a great big churning sea of mediocrity with all turds in it.

    We’re going to slightly let City off their recent nonsense for their years of anti-nonsense and assume based on factors that they’re not going to be sh*tbone awful for that much longer and will ease away with the other currently less stupid members of the top four.

    Below that we have from fifth-placed Nottingham Forest to 14th-placed West Ham a bunch of 10 teams separated by seven points who could finish in literally any order and it wouldn’t now be a surprise. Only two of them have scored more than 25 goals, and only two of them have conceded fewer than 20. Tottenham have managed to do both those things to absolutely no discernible benefit because of course they have.

    Tottenham, Newcastle, Man United sitting forlornly between 11th and 13th should shame them all, and while misery loves company there really shouldn’t be any lasting excuse in the fact some other teams who should also know better also don’t.

    The calendar year table tells a similar story. It’s kinder to some and harsher on others, but there are still the current top four, then a 15-point gap, then 10 further teams separated by just 10 points. And yes, there again are Spurs and Man United sitting level on points with Bournemouth and one ahead of Fulham.

    9) The Southampton copying both Sheffield United and Burnley blueprint sh*tshow
    We have some sympathy with the idea that Russell Martin might if anything, Clive, have got promoted too well at Southampton.

    But having foolishly got Southampton into the Premier League, Russell Martin has then set about keeping them up by following not one but two wildly successful blueprints from last season.

    Really is worth stepping back and marvelling at the sheer majesty of not just going “Let’s do what Burnley did” or “Let’s do what Sheffield United did” but going balls-out double-down “Let’s do what Burnley AND Sheffield United did”. In come Cameron Archer and Ben Brereton-Diaz, alongside a crazed PFM-baiting commitment to playing out from the back like prime Manchester City even when you have to deploy Alex McCarthy in goal against Liverpool.

    It’s worked roughly as well as you might expect, with one win, two draws and 31 goals conceded in 15 games, although we of course join you all in giddy anticipation of Sunday evening’s visit from Dr Tottenham.

    8) Newcastle’s summer sh*tshow
    Dan Ashworth’s departure wasn’t the only thing that went wrong for Newcastle. What a shambles of a summer that was.

    In essence as fans, if you’ve decided to row in fully behind your club selling the entirety of its soul and abandoning all your principles in return for unimaginable riches and unending success, then you do want to at the very least get some Chelsea or Manchester City success out of it.

    You don’t want to realise a couple of years down the line that you’ve thoroughly debased yourself like that in return for spending £20million on a back-up keeper from Nottingham Forest and bringing in defenders from Bournemouth on a free and all with the net result of being stuck in the hilarious yet dispiriting mid-table mass of incompetence sandwiched in 12th between the main clusterf*ck clubs themselves: Spurs and Manchester United.

    Newcastle fans can and will grumble about the actual effect of profit and sustainability rules being to in effect pull the drawbridge up behind the teams who had managed to buy their way into the elite before the Magpies got the chance.

    And they’re not even really wrong. But what they will have to accept is that in their very specific case it is very grimly funny to watch the way an entire club and a huge chunk of its support sold themselves out for what really does look like now like it might amount to one failed Champions League campaign. Especially with the Saudis already clearly growing weary of coming up against brick walls at Newcastle and already turning their attention to other shinier, newer and gaudier baubles in their sportswashing collection.

    7) West Ham and the Spanish Moyes sh*tshow
    The press boys didn’t like it one bit, but David Moyes and West Ham was a marriage that needed ending. Nobody was happy there. They wanted different things. It had gone really very stale.

    We fully supported West Ham’s decision to move on at the time and still do. But we did think they were going to actually go in a different direction, rather than appointing a decent coach who is nevertheless essentially a Spanish Moyes. But a Spanish Moyes with a proven tendency to huff off if he isn’t happy with how things are going.

    And nobody is happy with how things are going. Because the 2024/25 Premier League season is, as previously discussed, completely batsh*t, West Ham’s disastrous, sack-accelerating start to the season now sees them in dire straits yet trailing Manchester United by one point and Newcastle and Spurs by two. But what’s increasingly clear this season is that everyone needs to be making judgements of their team on its own merits rather than comparing it to what assorted other basket case clubs are up to.

    Monday night’s game with Wolves was billed as El Sackico and fair enough. It ended perfectly, with a narrow and deeply unconvincing West Ham win that showed precisely why neither Lopetegui or Gary O’Neil is likely to survive much longer.

    READ MORE: O’Neil red-hot Sack Race favourite after El Sackico defeat to major rival Lopetegui

    6) The England almost winning Euro 2024 sh*tshow
    Genuinely, what – and indeed how – the f***? It still freaks our nut out that England started the tournament still experimenting with key positions and vital roles – Trent in midfield! Kane as a Haaland type! Someone to play on the left! – and got all the way to the final without ever really coming up with any compellingly convincing solutions to any of them. But imagine if they’d actually won the bloody thing. The rest of the continent would quite rightly be hanging its head in shame.

    Europe as a whole owes Spain an enormous debt of gratitude for getting them all off the hook. Nobody need feel any shame for that excellent new and exciting Spain side coming out on top. But if Southgate’s confused and confusing Sufferballers had prevailed the shame across every nation would have quite rightly been vast. Because England were absolutely dreadful.

    And while Spain thoroughly outplayed them in the final, it’s still worth remembering that the result was still far too close for comfort. Spain’s winning goal came dangerously late, and there was a good 90-second period after Cole Palmer’s wonderful equaliser where it really did seem like it was a continent-wide mugging was well and truly on.

    It’s a tournament that already occupies a curious spot in our football consciousness. It’s weirdly blurred and fuzzy in the mind’s eye already. It doesn’t feel quite real somehow. Did England really get to a final playing like that? We’ve just spent five minutes trying to remember who England even played in the quarter-finals of a tournament five months ago, yet we could give you a minute-by-minute rundown of the Cameroon game from Italia 90.

    And yet we do still vividly remember those fleeting moments at 1-1 in the final when England suddenly had all the momentum, until Kyle Walker decided to launch an attacking throw-in all the way back into his own half for literally no discernible reason. We think about that at least twice every single day.

    5) The PSR-appeasing transfer circle-jerk sh*tshow
    Perhaps naively, we do think PSR was introduced with at least some good intentions. We certainly don’t think it was introduced to create the unedifying spectacle every June where teams with a black hole in the finances and facing possible points penalties set about conducting mutually advantageous transfers among themselves to get out of the mire.

    But it is actually a very obvious loophole once you look at it for even a second. With players coming through the academy counting as ‘pure profit’ for the PSR accountants, the temptation to cash in on those assets is obvious. Beyond that, there’s the fact that the entire fee for a player’s exit can be chucked into the latest accounts, while money spent on players coming in can be amortised across a number of years’ worth.

    And so, inevitably, as the June 30 deadline for the end of the PSR year approached, came a raft of absurd transfers. Most of which involved clubs at risk of punishment doing suspiciously convenient business directly with each other.

    Premier League clubs spent almost £250m between the end of the 23/24 season and June 30, and it’s fair to say that not all of that money was spent with the intention of maximising on-field improvement.

    Aston Villa, Everton, Chelsea and Newcastle were all busy bees in those crucial days of scrambling, and my word did they get some interesting business done. What glorious serendipity it was that Villa so admired Everton’s Lewis Dobbin while Everton were so impressed by Tim Iroegbunam that each agreed to give the other £9m and say no more about it.

    What merry happenstance it was that Chelsea had seen enough in Omari Kellyman’s six Aston Villa appearances to pay £19m for him while in an entirely unrelated development Villa themselves saw fit to hand the Blues £35m for Ian Maatsen as backs were scratched and quids pro quod.

    We’re still not precisely sure what arcane accountancy benefit Chelsea got out of spending £30m Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall but we’re sure there is one.

    MORE ON THE SUMMER PSR NONSENSE FROM F365
    👉 Ranking transfers between Chelsea and the rest of the panicky six by how much they’re taking the PSR
    👉 PSR deals dominate list of five transfers with £80m of unaccounted value

    4) The Cootegate sh*tshow
    Just a grimly depressing spectacle from start to finish. It has ultimately and inevitably cost a man his livelihood, made life harder for every other referee in the land, and given succour and fuel to the worst kind of very online, tinfoil-sporting fans (of all stripes) around.

    David Coote was obviously done for the moment it all came out. Especially as one’s first thought was that he was so unbelievably stupid as to have allowed himself to be filmed calling Jurgen Klopp an arrogant German c***, there was almost no chance that a) this was a freak one-off error of judgement and thus b) the tabloids wouldn’t find more.

    Coote has lost everything, but has perhaps learned who his actual friends are. There is a Partridgeian tragedy to some of the stories that have emerged. The aborted Travelodge Drugs Party is a harrowing tale of loneliness and middle-aged despair, while by the end of it his apparent need to impress people online led to him managing to get in trouble for correctly booking a player who collected 32 yellow cards in 171 games for Leeds.

    While that highlighted how daft things had got, it also showed why he was done. It didn’t actually matter whether he’d done anything specifically wrong professionally. It didn’t matter that every referee in the world will think at least some of the far better paid people who scream at them and call them names and blame them for their own failings, in public, every week for 40 weeks of the year are c***s, actually.

    What mattered is that nothing he could ever do as a referee could now ever be removed from his own daft stupidity at an afters with some tw*ts. Give a decision that hurts Liverpool? Off goes the internet. Well we all know why, don’t we. Give a decision that benefits Liverpool? Over-compensating.

    There’s no point pretending it wasn’t funny to hear a referee speak the way he did. It was like hearing your teacher do a swear.

    But what a genuinely pitiful way to lose absolutely everything you’ve worked for.

    3) The Spursy sh*tshow
    Lads, it’s Tottenham. Really, really, really Tottenham. Like you look at Tottenham in 2024 and ask how much more Tottenham it could be and the answer is ‘none’. None… more Tottenham.

    Fans can and are arguing and debating who is to blame for it all, from Daniel Levy to Ange Postecoglou to Micky van de Van’s twangy hamstrings to James Maddison’s goal celebrations to leaving themselves perpetually in dread fear of one key injury sparking utter chaos in a season that was always likely to involve well over 50 matches and a playing style that appears custom-built to increase the risk of tissue injuries.

    Spurs have crystallised and distilled Spursiness to the extent that we do now think we’re witnessing the very peak of it. Steven Chicken rightly noted after the latest nonsense against Chelsea that this season in particular has seen Spursiness extend far beyond its traditional N17 boundaries with all manner of daftness involving all manner of clubs. Yet still there Spurs are, right in the thick of it all and still the absolute best/worst nonsense creators in the sport.

    And it’s been going on for the whole damn year, too. They’ve lost as many Premier League matches as they’ve won in 2024 and as previously noted have only managed to accrue the same number of points as Bournemouth and, even more damningly, Manchester United.

    They are currently at the very peak of their powers, though. Across all competitions they have won only three of their last 10 matches. Two of those were against Man City, the other Aston Villa. Their two league wins in that wretched run have been 4-1 and 4-0 thrashings. They have also handed both Crystal Palace and Ipswich their first Premier League wins of the season, thrown away their second 2-0 lead of the season, conceded an injury-time equaliser at home to the 11th-best team in Italy, lost to Galatasaray and Bournemouth and somehow managed to avoid doing so after being thoroughly outplayed by Fulham.

    Their next Premier League match is away at Southampton, a game in which there are quite literally only two possible outcomes: a 2-1 defeat that tells us everything, or a 4-1 win that tells us nothing.

    1=) The Man United Ten Hag sh*tshow
    Even by Manchester United’s recent standards, this has been quite the year. There are so many inevitable and easy contrasts to be drawn between Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s relentlessly grim penny-pinching in some areas and the wasteful incompetent profligacy in others.

    While the great man has been LinkedIn-ing his way around laying people off, complaining about flexible working and mucky offices and ignoring the women’s team and removing concession ticket prices for minimal financial gain and all manner of terrible optics, United have also been giving Erik Ten Hag a new contract and hundreds of million pounds’ worth of new footballers and then realising what literally every other person on earth knew to be true and sacking him at ruinous expense a few months later.

    1=) The Man United Ashworth sh*tshow
    And then there’s Ashworth, a nonsense cherry atop a nonsense cake that absolutely demands its own entry. One, because This Is Manchester United Football Club We’re Talking About and two, because it is very funny.

    From Ashworth accidentally CCing Newcastle in on an email that confirmed United had tapped him up, to the months on gardening leave before his grand entrance, to his eventual appointment within a structure that gave Jason Wilcox far more power than any football fan in the 1990s could ever have predicted, to the bungled summer and his – again and undoubtedly ruinously expensive – departure this week after just five months of actual employment, it’s been a rollercoaster ride of complete ridiculousness from a club that was supposed to be moving past all this sort of caper now because the grown-ups were in charge.

    The possibility of Ashworth may very well emerge from this ludicrous chapter that demeans all involved by stumbling upwards into a similar job at Arsenal would be a lovely coda.

    READ NEXT: Ranking Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s mistakes at Man Utd: Disability budget cuts in at five

  • Google reveals the most popular search queries of Ukrainians in 2024

    Google reveals the most popular search queries of Ukrainians in 2024

    Google reveals the most popular search queries of Ukrainians in 2024

    “Power outage schedule” became the most popular query for Ukrainians on Google in 2024. Other top searches included Euro 2024, Oleksandr Syrsky, 20 Days in Mariupol, and EcoFlow.

    “Schedule of power outages” is the most popular Google query among Ukrainians in 2024, UNN reports, citing Google.

    Details

    The most popular joke of the 2024 rock was the "Graphicvid switch of the candle". The "Euro 2024" is written on the other position, and the "Sirsky" is written on the third. Similarly, the top is filled with rock – "Olimpiiski igri 2024", "Easter 2024" and "Suja".

    Among the personalities who were "Googled", the first place is occupied by the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Alexander Syrsky. Ukrainians were also actively interested in such people as Alexander Usyk, Donald Trump, Kamala Harris and Klavdia Petrovna.

    As for the losses in 2024, most of the requests were about Irina Farion, Alexey Navalny and Alain Delon.

    But in the queries of the category "films", the first place was taken by the Ukrainian documentary "20 days in Mariupol". In the second and third positions – animation "thoughts inside out 2" and space fiction "Dune. Part two.

    According to requests related to purchases, Ukrainians were most interested in EcoFlow, charging stations, inverters and solar panels. Dubai chocolate, squash paw and tubing have also become popular.

    In 2024, Ukrainian users searched for what the abbreviations MSEC, electronic warfare, TSNAP and KAB mean. in addition, Ukrainians tried to find out the meaning of the words "waste heaps", "quadrobers" and "chinases", as well as what the blackout queues and the OK-7 help are.

    recall

    Google searches for moving to Canada increased by 1,270%, to New Zealand by 2,000%, and to Australia by 820%. Immigration lawyers report a sharp increase in applications from Americans.

  • lukashenko said that he had “imported” more than a dozen nuclear warheads into Belarus

    lukashenko said that he had “imported” more than a dozen nuclear warheads into Belarus

    lukashenko said that he had “imported” more than a dozen nuclear warheads into Belarus

    The self-proclaimed president of Belarus reported the importation of several dozens of nuclear warheads into the country. He emphasized that these are tactical nuclear weapons, which are 5 times more powerful than the “hazelnut” complex.

    The self-proclaimed president of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, claims that Belarus has allegedly received more than a dozen nuclear warheads. This UNN reports with reference to BELTA.

    “I brought nuclear warheads here. More than a dozen of them. Many people wrote: “Oh, it's a joke, nobody brought anything.” They did. And the fact that they (opponents – ed.) say it's a joke means they missed it. They haven't even noticed how we brought them here,” said Lukashenko.

    Lukashenko made a corresponding statement, answering a question about plans to deploy the Russian Oreshnik missile system in Belarus, which is not a nuclear weapon, but has "great power".

    “If nuclear weapons are used, it is a great responsibility. At least after Hiroshima, Nagasaki (the US nuclear bombing of these Japanese cities in 1945 – ed.) no one has pressed the nuclear button yet…But I warned all my enemies, 'friends' and rivals: if you step on the state border line, the response will be instant. I will not look at nuclear weapons or anything else,” the self-proclaimed president said.

    According to him, Belarus agreed on this with the Russians even before they allegedly returned nuclear weapons to Belarus.

    "It's not the same weapon that we gave them. There were strategic weapons there. And this is a tactical nuclear weapon. Although it is probably 5 times more powerful than this "hazel tree"," Lukashenko said.

    Belarus has included nuclear weapons in its military doctrineJan 17 2024, 12:47 AM • 31346 views

    Supplement

    Lukashenko asked Russian dictator Vladimir Putin to deploy new weapons systems on the territory of the country, including the Oreshnik missile system . Putin indicated that the hazel will enter service with the armed forces of the Russian Federation and Belarus in parallel.

    Andriy Kovalenko, head of the Center for Countering Disinformation of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, said that Russia continues information manipulationusing fear propaganda to influence the West.

    The deployment of “hazelnut” in Belarus, like previous statements about nuclear weapons, is purely informational in nature and is designed to intimidate the civilian population and change public sentiment in Europe.

  • 70% of Ukrainians support ‘West German’ model for NATO accession, survey shows

    70% of Ukrainians support ‘West German’ model for NATO accession, survey shows

    70% of Ukrainians support 'West German' model for NATO accession, survey shows

    Some 70.3% of Ukrainians are in favor of their country's gradual accession into NATO in a model resembling the entry of West Germany, according to a survey by the Kyiv-based New Europe Center published on Dec. 10.

    A key difference is that the invitation would encompass the entire Ukraine, but the alliance's defensive "umbrella" would extend to the occupied territories only after their future liberation.

    Talks about a possible post-war security structure grew increasingly relevant as U.S. President-elect Donald Trump showed reluctance to maintain long-term support for Ukraine and pledged to push both sides to the negotiating table.

    As Russia holds the upper hand on the battlefield and the prospects of liberating occupied territories militarily appear slim in the near future, NATO accession pathways resembling that of West Germany begin to gain traction both in the West and Kyiv.

    West Germany entered the alliance in 1955, with the territories of East Germany joining only after the country's reunification in 1990.

    The growing difficulties are also reflected in the New Europe Center's survey. While the majority of Ukrainians remain distrustful of Russia and are averse to making concessions, the latter indicator has decreased in comparison to last year.

    At the same time, the Ukrainians are reluctant to enter talks with Russia without security guarantees, believing that a ceasefire would simply give Moscow a chance to recover and launch another war.

    According to the poll, 64.1% of Ukrainians do not believe that talks with Russia are worthwhile without appropriate security guarantees by the West. In comparison, 30% favor negotiations without preconditions, believing Ukraine does not have the resources to sustain a war of attrition.

    Some 31.3% of respondents consider the development of nuclear weapons — a step rejected by Kyiv — to be the most effective security guarantee. Only a slightly smaller number — 29.3% —see the accession to NATO as the most optimal course. Only 6.4% of Ukrainians have trust in the possible deployment of European peacekeepers in Ukraine.

    President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Dec. 1 that if Ukraine were to join NATO, the alliance's Article 5 collective defense principle may not apply to Ukrainian territories facing active combat. This marked a notable shift in Ukraine's rhetoric, which previously insisted on fully restoring territorial integrity as a precondition for a successful peace settlement.

    More recent statements show a willingness to temporarily forego military liberation in the occupied territories for security guarantees, namely NATO membership. Zelensky said certain regions, like Crimea, might have to be liberated through diplomacy.

    As signs of talks about West Germany model for Ukraine peace emerge, experts weigh in on feasibilityUkraine is seeking membership in the NATO military alliance as a part of its plan to end Russia’s war, and recent reports suggest a West Germany model is seriously being discussed among Kyiv and its allies. During a September visit to the U.S., Head of the Presidential Office70% of Ukrainians support 'West German' model for NATO accession, survey showsThe Kyiv IndependentAsami Terajima70% of Ukrainians support 'West German' model for NATO accession, survey shows
  • China imposes unprecedented restrictions on the export of UAV components: what it means for Ukraine

    China imposes unprecedented restrictions on the export of UAV components: what it means for Ukraine

    China imposes unprecedented restrictions on the export of UAV components: what it means for Ukraine

    China is introducing new restrictions on the export of key components for the production of UAVs to the United States and Europe. This could significantly affect the production of drones in Ukraine, as China controls 80% of the component market.

    China has begun to reduce the supply of important components for the production of drones to Europe and the United States, which could negatively affect Ukraine's defense capabilities.

    Reports UNN with reference to Bloomberg.

    Details

    China has begun cutting supplies of key components for drones (including civilian ones) – for both American and European companies.

    According to Bloomberg, there is speculation that the relevant steps are a prelude to broader export restrictions on drone parts. Beijing will put them into effect in the new year, sources say.

    According to one of the interlocutors, these rules can take the form of licensing permits based on the intended use of components or more lenient requirements for Chinese companies to notify the government of their supply plans.

    In July 2024, China announced a ban on the export of drones for military use, while Beijing claims that it does not supply weapons to any of the parties to the conflict. But European officials say Chinese companies are developing attack drones for Russia's aggressive actions, particularly Russia's war in Ukraine.

    How Russia, China and nuclear weapons are involved in unknown drones in the UK – expertDec 1 2024, 03:26 AM • 61151 view

    Bloomberg recalls that the trade conflict between the West and China escalated this month when Washington restricted sales of high-bandwidth memory chips and additional semiconductor equipment to China.

    In response, Beijing banned the sale of dual-use goods to the US military,as well as several high-tech and military-grade materials to American companies.

    Measures taken weeks before Donald Trump returns to the presidency with a tough agenda for China have led to a sharp rise in prices.

    China's embargo on drone components will affect UAV production in Ukraine

    Western countries are trying to build and assemble drones outside of China to secure their supply chains. But the PRC remains the center of production of cheap equipment for these devices. According to a report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, China controls almost 80% of the commercial drone market.

    Many UAV manufacturers in Ukraine rely on Chinese components to produce cheap and effective weapons, which have become crucial in countering Russian aggression.

    About 50 manufacturers from China supply components for UAVs used by the enemy to attack Ukraine – Oleksandr RuvinOct 8 2024, 07:30 AM • 101322 views