Author: dmitriy.vasyura@gmail.com

  • Zelenskyy explains why he can’t journey to Moscow for talks with Putin

    Zelenskyy explains why he can’t journey to Moscow for talks with Putin

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has as soon as once more rejected a Kremlin proposal that he journey to Moscow for talks.

    Supply: Zelenskyy throughout an internet press briefing, as reported by European Pravda

    Quote: "I’ve heard a number of instances publicly that the Russian facet has prolonged invites… I feel they have been inviting me personally. I’ve responded to that…

    I can’t go to talks with Putin in Moscow, the capital of the nation that’s the aggressor on this warfare. We’re able to assist US proposals to satisfy on any territory: America, Europe, impartial international locations, any states aside from the Russian Federation and Belarus."

    Particulars: Concerning Belarus, Zelenskyy reiterated that it has been an ally in Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine since 2022.

    Assist Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!

  • Sam Bankman-Fried Seeks FTX Retrial Citing Recent Testimony

    Sam Bankman-Fried Seeks FTX Retrial Citing Recent Testimony

    FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried is legally difficult his 25-year sentence, submitting a movement for a brand new trial on February 10.

    The thirty-three-year-old cites “contemporary testimony” that allegedly proves the defunct trade was solvent.

    The submitting probably throws a spanner within the liquidation course of, with the declare that the Division of Justice suppressed vital proof throughout the authentic proceedings.

    🚨 EXCLUSIVE: SBF SEEKS NEW TRIAL, CLAIMS DOJ SILENCED DEFENSE WITNESSES AND MISLED JURY ON FTX SOLVENCY
    Sam Bankman-Fried has filed a Rule 33 movement for a brand new trial alleging that the jury by no means heard vital proof, together with sworn declarations claiming FTX was solvent… https://t.co/5fQ3ai4OH2 pic.twitter.com/ggCkYwcIkW

    — Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) February 10, 2026

    Why Is Bankman-Fried In search of a New FTX Trial Now?

    It has been years since FTX’s November 2022 collapse worn out $8 billion in buyer funds.

    Since then, self-custody has turn into a buzzword for retail buyers, who’ve needed to reside by means of a number of bear markets whereas US regulators put together complete laws to make sure it doesn’t occur once more.

    Nonetheless, SBF isn’t completed combating. Serving a 25-year sentence, the disgraced mogul filed a professional se movement citing Rule 33 of the Federal Guidelines of Legal Process.

    Bankman-Fried argues that his authentic conviction was a miscarriage of justice as a result of key witnesses by no means took the stand.

    Whereas world enforcement efforts typically efficiently goal monetary malfeasance by means of customary audits, SBF contends the DOJ’s speedy prosecution missed the precise monetary actuality of FTX.US.

    He maintains that the cash was “at all times there,” a declare he intends to help with proof that was allegedly unavailable throughout his preliminary protection.

    What the New Movement Claims

    The brand new submitting particularly hinges on declarations from Daniel Chapsky, the previous head of knowledge science at FTX.US.

    Based on the movement, Chapsky’s knowledge evaluation contradicts the federal government’s narrative concerning the $8 billion shortfall.

    Bankman-Fried additionally factors to probably favorable testimony from former co-CEO Ryan Salame, who’s presently serving a seven-and-a-half-year sentence.

    Within the authorized paperwork filed Feb. 10, Bankman-Fried alleges that prosecutors intimidated witnesses and that Choose Lewis Kaplan confirmed “manifest prejudice” by speeding the decision. He’s demanding a brand new choose for any retrial, framing the unique proceedings as politically motivated “lawfare”.

    Whereas the trade has largely shifted towards a compliance-focused market construction to stop one other FTX-style meltdown, SBF argues the DoJ prevented him from exhibiting the jury knowledge that proved solvency.

    Authorized specialists notice that Rule 33 motions face an extremely excessive bar, typically considered as a “Hail Mary” in federal appeals.

    New proof exhibits that Biden's DOJ threatened a number of witnesses into silence or into altering their testimony. My conviction ought to be thrown out.
    Choose Lewis Kaplan ought to recuse himself from this movement. Given his sample of prejudging defendants—together with me, @rsalame7926,… pic.twitter.com/MgT9GdPZqu

    — SBF (@SBF_FTX) February 11, 2026

    What This Means for Crypto Regulation

    Whereas a retrial is statistically unlikely, the movement retains the FTX wounds contemporary for lively merchants and victims awaiting restitution.

    The persistence of the case highlights the long-term dangers of offshore trade failures.

    Regulators are probably to make use of this continued authorized drama to justify stricter oversight. We’re already seeing related crackdowns globally, corresponding to when Venezuela’s anti-corruption investigation shut down exchanges in a large sweep.

    For the market, this serves as a stark reminder that the authorized fallout from the 2022 crash is much from over, at the same time as costs recuperate.

    Uncover:

    • Prime crypto for portfolio diversification
    • Greatest crypto presales

    The put up Sam Bankman-Fried Seeks FTX Retrial Citing Recent Testimony appeared first on Cryptonews.

  • The problem of elections in Ukraine should be determined by Ukrainians themselves – Rutte

    The problem of elections in Ukraine should be determined by Ukrainians themselves – Rutte

    The problem of elections in Ukraine should be determined by Ukrainians themselves – Rutte<p>NATO Secretary Normal Mark Rutte acknowledged that the choice on holding elections in Ukraine through the struggle is an inside matter of the state. The Alliance sees no grounds for exterior strain on the Ukrainian management concerning this concern.</p>

  • Zelenskyy reveals subjects mentioned with Russians in Abu Dhabi

    Zelenskyy reveals subjects mentioned with Russians in Abu Dhabi

    The newest spherical of talks between Ukraine and Russia in Abu Dhabi on 4-5 February centered on mechanisms for a ceasefire, however the events failed to achieve an settlement on the small print.

    Supply: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in an interview with Bloomberg, as reported by European Pravda

    Particulars: Zelenskyy says that the newest talks between the delegations within the United Arab Emirates centered on ceasefire mechanisms and methods for the USA to supervise and monitor it. Nonetheless, the negotiating groups have been unable to agree on the small print with out political selections on the highest stage.

    Zelenskyy famous that through the discussions, it turned clear that any ceasefire would require monitoring with US involvement, however the specifics haven’t but been finalised.

    "Russians have one wording, we’ve one other one, the Individuals have the third one. There’s an understanding that there will likely be monitoring, however there may be additionally an understanding [that] extra work is required on wording and particulars," Zelenskyy mentioned.

    Zelenskyy expressed hope that Ukraine and the USA would attain an understanding throughout a brand new spherical of talks scheduled for subsequent week.

    "In the meanwhile we’re additionally speaking a few sequencing plan of all our actions, together with signing of paperwork," he added.

    Background:

    • In keeping with a communiqué on the result of the trilateral talks held in Abu Dhabi on 4-5 February, the US, Ukrainian and Russian delegations mentioned strategies for implementing a ceasefire and monitoring the cessation of hostilities.
    • Final week, Reuters reported that US and Ukrainian negotiators had additionally mentioned the opportunity of signing a peace settlement in March and holding elections in Ukraine in Might.
    • Reuters reported that two key points stay unresolved within the negotiations: Donbas and the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Energy Plant.

    Help Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!

  • Thomas Frank ‘continuously happening about Arsenal’ as particulars of Spurs downfall emerge

    The first step on the information to the best way to be a soccer supervisor should say don’t preserve speaking about your membership’s greatest rivals being actually good.

  • Ukrainian skeleton racer Heraskevych dangers disqualification over "reminiscence helmet"

    Ukrainian skeleton racer Heraskevych dangers disqualification over "reminiscence helmet"<p>Ukrainian skeleton racer Vladyslav Heraskevych continues to make use of a helmet with photos of deceased athletes, regardless of warnings from the IOC. The Worldwide Olympic Committee states that this violates guidelines relating to political messages on the Olympic Video games.</p>

  • Russia is quickly shedding its scientific potential: patents, improvements, and universities are declining – International Intelligence Service

    Russia is quickly shedding its scientific potential: patents, improvements, and universities are declining – International Intelligence Service

    The variety of patents in Russia has shrunk to a minimal in over 20 years, and actual improvements have just about disappeared. Russia invests extra in buying overseas applied sciences than in creating its personal science.

    Russian science is in a state of systemic collapse, which sharply accelerated after the beginning of the full-scale conflict towards Ukraine. The variety of patents within the Russian Federation has decreased to a minimal in additional than 20 years, and actual improvements have just about disappeared, giving option to copying overseas applied sciences. This was reported by the International Intelligence Service of Ukraine, in accordance with UNN.

    Particulars

    In accordance with intelligence knowledge, the variety of patents issued in Russia for scientific innovations and developments fell by 25% and reached its lowest stage for the reason that early 2000s. On the identical time, official innovation statistics create a misunderstanding of exercise: in 2025, Russian corporations introduced the implementation of 2725 "superior applied sciences," however solely about 10% of them have been really new. The remainder of the options are secondary and have lengthy been used outdoors the Russian Federation.

    The monetary mannequin of scientific improvement additionally signifies a lack of scientific sovereignty. After the beginning of the so-called "SVO" (particular navy operation), expenditures on analysis and improvement don’t exceed 1% of GDP. On the identical time, Russia spends about 1.5% of GDP yearly on importing the outcomes of such work, and as much as 2% together with know-how. Actually, the state invests extra in buying overseas applied sciences than in creating its personal science.

    The present decline is a consequence of extended degradation. Russia's withdrawal from the Bologna system in 2022, together with worldwide sanctions, remoted scientists from cooperation with main world facilities. Continual underfunding and mass emigration of specialists undermined the analysis base throughout the nation. In response, the Kremlin launched administrative restrictions: scientists and lecturers have been obliged to coordinate journeys to "unfriendly" international locations. This checklist contains 49 states, together with EU international locations, the G7, and key scientific facilities in East Asia, which successfully means virtually full worldwide isolation.

    The results of this coverage are additionally mirrored in worldwide rankings. Within the Leiden College scientific exercise rating for 2025, no Russian increased schooling establishment made it into the highest 2 hundred. The very best end result was proven by Moscow State College, which took solely 227th place. In a yr, it misplaced 12 positions, and since 2021 – 29 positions, which confirms the systemic decline of Russian tutorial science.

    Recall

    The Russian economic system is experiencing its deepest disaster within the final 20 years, which can drive the Kremlin to revise its financial coverage. By the tip of 2025, a pointy slowdown in industrial progress and a report price range deficit have been recorded.

  • “Love Is Blind” creator reveals why a pair went to Malibu alone as a substitute of Mexico with the others (unique)

    “Love Is Blind” creator reveals why a pair went to Malibu alone as a substitute of Mexico with the others (unique)

    Victor and Christine Love is Blind S 10 Victor and Christine Love is Blind S 10
    Vic and Christine on 'Love Is Blind' season 10. Credit score:

    Adam Rose/Netflix (2)

    This text comprises spoilers about Love Is Blind season 10, episodes 1-6.

    One Love Is Blind season 10 couple hit the jackpot.

    After getting engaged within the very first episode, Vic and Christine skilled one thing that no different couple has within the historical past of Netflix's actuality courting experiment. As an alternative of happening the post-engagement journey with all the opposite {couples} featured this season, they bought to get pleasure from their very own, non-public, romantic journey, away from all of the drama of the opposite {couples} and with none producers watching over them. And the creator of the sequence reveals to Leisure Weekly solely why that call was made this season.

    "Love Is Blind by no means fails to shock — we've by no means adopted this many {couples} earlier than, and it's actually thrilling," creator Chris Coelen tells EW in an unique interview concerning the first batch of season 10 episodes. "We had seven nice {couples}, and we felt actually strongly about all of them. Usually, we might solely monitor as much as 5 and generally we've stretched to 6 — even when now we have extra engagements than that, we will type of zero in [on who to drop]. And this time, we couldn't. We actually felt like that we had an abundance of terrific selections, so we made the choice to observe all of them."

    Victor and Christine Love is Blind S 10
    Vic an Christine in 'Love Is Blind' season 10.

    Netflix

    However as a result of expanded roster of featured {couples} this season, producers needed to get artistic to determine a technique to observe all of them after the pod portion concluded.

    "A part of the explanation that we will't observe greater than usually 5, and generally we stretch to 6, is that we don't have the funds to try this," Coelen explains. "That's one thing I've talked about each single season, we simply don't have the funds. We don't even have the funds to observe six, however we stretch, and we determine it out. And so there's completely no manner we might do it with seven."

    In the midst of episode 5, a title card revealed that Vic and Christine have been despatched on their very own to Calamigos Ranch in Malibu, Calif., whereas the opposite six engaged {couples} went to Cabo San Lucas in Mexico collectively. Vic and Christine's journey was solely documented with handheld selfie movies (once more, because of funds causes), however they’ll nonetheless be featured all through the remainder of the season as a predominant couple, filmed by producers, as soon as they return dwelling to Ohio.

    Love is Blind S 10
    'Love Is Blind' season 10 title card reveals a primary for the present.

    Netflix

    "We mentioned, 'You recognize what, we're going to ship one couple on their very own particular person romantic getaway, they usually get to do quite a lot of the issues that the {couples} that do go to Mexico bought to do,'" Coelen says. "We needed to decide one, and the couple that we picked, what I mentioned to them earlier than we despatched them on their journey, 'We love you, we need to observe you, we need to be with you again in Ohio. You guys have been by yourself wonderful romantic bubble, your romantic island, this entire whole time.'"

    As a result of Vic and Christine didn't produce other romantic entanglements moreover one another within the pods, it made the choice straightforward to separate them from the remainder of the engaged {couples} for this a part of the season.

    'Love Is Blind' creator reveals who pays for engagement rings, who keeps them Patrick Suzuki, Kacie Mcintosh in episode 905 of Love Is Blind Every 'Love Is Blind' couple who is still together (and who just announced their divorce) Taylor Haag and Daniel Hastings; Cameron Hamilton and Lauren Speed-Hamilton; Zack Goytowski and Bliss Poureetezadi

    "A part of what folks do once they go to Mexico is that they resolve unresolved threads," Coelen says. "That's a part of the purpose of going to Mexico and seeing all of the others, and Vic and Christine actually didn't have any of these unresolved threads. So that they have been those that we picked to go on the journey by themselves."

    Coelen clarifies that Vic and Christine "dated different folks," however they didn't create any drama that may erupt upon mixing with the opposite {couples} in Mexico. In contrast to the others, who’re in a love pentagon and must cope with their exes on the journey.

    Victor and Christine Love is Blind S 10
    Vic and Christine on 'Love Is Blind' season 10.

    Netflix

    "Bri, for example, her high 4 guys that she was courting on the finish have been all in Mexico, all of them," Coelen factors out. "And there was only a dwell interconnectivity amongst folks: Connor with Emma and Bri, and simply so many individuals, so many type of free threads. We at all times inform them it's good for them to have the chance to both resolve these threads or work out that there's one thing extra there that's going to trigger them to not get married. These are the sorts of issues they should resolve earlier than the altar. And, like I mentioned, Vic and Christine didn't have that."

    Coelen provides that, after they have been informed they have been getting their very own non-public journey, Vic and Christine took the information properly.

    "It was precisely the response that you’d need, which is they only have been in love and felt like they needed to spend time collectively," he says. "And I don't suppose it actually mattered to them whether or not they have been going to go off and have time in Malibu or Mexico. They simply actually needed to spend time with one another. And after I defined to them the explanation they have been going to ship them to Malibu earlier than sending them again to Ohio, they thought that it made complete sense."

    Get your day by day dose of leisure information, superstar updates, and what to observe with our EW Dispatch e-newsletter.

    And regardless of the expanded variety of engaged {couples} this season, don't anticipate to get further episodes. Coelen confirms that season 10 will include the identical variety of episodes as current seasons: 12.

    "It's tough to attempt to steadiness the tales, however I believe we did a extremely nice job," he says. "I actually consider this season is perhaps our greatest season."

    Love Is Blind season 10 releases episodes 7-9 on Wednesday, Feb. 18, with episodes 10-11 the next week on Feb. 25, and the finale on March 4 on Netflix.

    Shut

  • White Home Stablecoin Talks Stall as Banks Push for Yield Restrictions

    White Home Stablecoin Talks Stall as Banks Push for Yield Restrictions

    Excessive-stakes negotiations between U.S. banking giants and crypto executives on the White Home hit a wall yesterday, ending in an deadlock over stablecoin yields.

    Banks demanded restrictive “prohibition ideas” on holder rewards, whereas crypto leaders argued such bans would suffocate innovation within the digital greenback economic system.

    Key Takeaways

    • Banks are pushing for a broad ban on all monetary and non-financial advantages tied to holding fee stablecoins.
    • Crypto corporations, together with Coinbase and Ripple, rejected the proposals, warning they’d stifle competitors.
    • Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent faces a tough deadline of July 2026 to finalize GENIUS Act implementation guidelines.

    Will Banking Pursuits Kill the Yield?

    The core friction stems from the implementation of the GENIUS Act, signed in July 2025, which goals to manage stablecoin issuance whereas insulating conventional banking deposits.

    Banks argue that interest-bearing stablecoins threaten their liquidity fashions, primarily fearing an enormous deposit drain if customers can earn increased yields on-chain.

    This regulatory tug-of-war highlights the business’s shift towards a compliance-focused market the place regulatory pressures now dictate challenge viability.

    The White Home Crypto Coverage Council is scrambling to search out frequent floor. Yesterday’s assembly was the second this month. With lawmakers and the business hoping to finalize guidelines by the midterm elections this November, the clock is ticking.

    Banks are successfully making an attempt to firewall their deposit base from digital opponents, a transfer that might neuter the aggressive benefit of non-bank stablecoin issuers.

    Uncover: The subsequent crypto to blow up in 2026

    Contained in the Closed-Door Battle on the White Home

    In response to a doc offered by the banking aspect in the course of the session, which included Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase, the banks laid out strict “prohibition ideas.”

    🚨NEW: Particulars from the White Home stablecoin yield assembly, per banking and crypto sources within the room:
    Individuals on each side known as the assembly ‘productive,’ however, once more, no compromise was reached by the top of the assembly. Nonetheless, deal specifics have been mentioned in additional element… pic.twitter.com/w5nPlG1DLi

    — Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) February 11, 2026

    These ideas name for a complete ban on any advantages, monetary or in any other case, tied to holding or utilizing fee stablecoins. Attendees famous that banks took a tough line, demanding enforcement measures that go nicely past the present draft of the market construction invoice.

    Whereas present legislative drafts typically bar passive yield, banks need to crush even restricted activity-based rewards.

    Crypto stakeholders, together with the Blockchain Affiliation and Ripple, reportedly “dug in” in opposition to these calls for.

    The banking sector insists that exemptions for stablecoin rewards have to be extraordinarily slim in scope, leaving little room for the varieties of incentive applications that drive DeFi adoption.

    Uncover: New cryptocurrencies to put money into immediately

    Implications for the Market

    If these restrictions maintain, the U.S. dangers stifling the very innovation the GENIUS Act was meant to legitimize.

    Traders ought to watch the July deadline carefully; failure to compromise might drive a capital to flee to jurisdictions with clearer, pro-yield frameworks.

    Simply as Venezuela’s anti-corruption investigation rocked its native crypto business with aggressive shutdowns, a heavy-handed U.S. ban on stablecoin yields might severely impression home liquidity.

    Whereas banks intention to guard their deposit base from disruption, the crypto market views yield as a elementary function, not a bug.

    If the banks win this spherical, the utility of U.S.-regulated stablecoins may very well be capped at easy transaction rails, stripping them of their funding potential.

    Yesterday on the White Home the bankers dropped their record of calls for surrounding stablecoin yield. TL;DR, banks are f_cked they usually realize it.
    Abstract:
    The GENIUS Act treats fee stablecoins strictly as fee devices, not deposit or funding merchandise. To stop… pic.twitter.com/vQbIDaRd9U

    — Carlo⚖ (@CarloD_Angelo) February 11, 2026

    Uncover: February’s finest crypto presales

    The put up White Home Stablecoin Talks Stall as Banks Push for Yield Restrictions appeared first on Cryptonews.

  • FSB officer tortured Ukrainians in Kharkiv area – electrocuted and filed enamel

    FSB officer tortured Ukrainians in Kharkiv area – electrocuted and filed enamel

    FSB officer tortured Ukrainians in Kharkiv area – electrocuted and filed enamel<p>The Kharkiv prosecutor's workplace has despatched to courtroom the case of an FSB officer who tortured civilians within the Kharkiv area. The accused abused Ukrainians, utilizing electrical shock torture and submitting enamel.</p>