Author: dmitriy.vasyura@gmail.com

  • FTC Launches antitrust investigation against Microsoft: what is known

    FTC Launches antitrust investigation against Microsoft: what is known

    FTC Launches antitrust investigation against Microsoft: what is known

    The US Federal Trade Commission has launched an antitrust investigation into Microsoft's software and cloud computing licensing activities. The investigation covers the company's possible market abuses and Q is cybersecurity practices.

    The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has launched a large-scale antitrust investigation against Microsoft, including its software licensing and cloud computing businesses. This is reported by Reuters, reports UNN.

    Details

    Reuters reports on informants who confirmed that the FTC is investigating a case and allegations against a software giant that potentially abuses its position in the Productivity Software Market by imposing punitive licensing conditions to prevent customers from migrating their data from Azure cloud services to other competing platforms.

    The investigation was approved by FTC Chairman Lina Han before her likely resignation in January.

    The informant also said that the FTC is also studying practices related to cybersecurity and artificial intelligence products.

    Competitors have criticized Microsoft's practices, which they say keep customers locked in its Azure cloud platform. The FTC received such complaints last year when it was studying the cloud computing market.

    NetChoice, a lobbying group representing internet companies including Amazon and Google that compete with Microsoft in cloud computing, has criticized Microsoft's licensing policies and the integration of artificial intelligence tools into Office and Outlook.

    Given that Microsoft is the world's largest software development company, dominating the productivity and operating system software industry, the scale and implications of its licensing decisions are extraordinary.

    – declared the group.

    Microsoft declined to comment.

    Microsoft detects large-scale phishing attack from Russian hackers Midnight BlizzardOct 30 2024, 08:00 AM • 14996 views

  • Ex-Minister Kuleba skeptical about peace prospects during Trump’s presidency

    Ex-Minister Kuleba skeptical about peace prospects during Trump’s presidency

    Ex-Minister Kuleba skeptical about peace prospects during Trump's presidency

    U.S. President-elect Donald Trump is unlikely to bring a peace deal to Ukraine as Russian President Vladimir Putin still believes he can achieve all his goals, ex-Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba told Politico in an interview published on Nov. 27.

    According to Ukraine's former diplomacy chief, Ukraine is a "personal obsession for Putin" but also a way to "show to the world how the West is incapable of defending itself or what it stands for."

    Trump has criticized military support provided to Ukraine by the Biden administration and pledged to get the U.S. "out" of the war. While the details of his plans remain elusive, some reports indicate this would entail forcing Ukraine to cede territory and at least temporarily give up on its NATO accession plans.

    Trump's approach is more likely to starve Ukraine of weapons and cause the front to collapse, allowing Russian forces to move up to the cities of Dnipro, Zaporizhzhia, and Poltava, Kuleba said.

    Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky also cannot sign a peace deal that would recognize occupied territories as Russian and forego Kyiv's NATO aspirations, as such a step would be against the Constitution and Zelensky's political end, Kuleba believes.

    Zelensky recently told Fox News that Ukraine would never recognize Russian occupation but admitted that Crimea would have to be liberated through diplomatic means. He also appealed to the international community to help bring about a diplomatic and just end of the war next year.

    While voicing hopes that Putin will make a mistake in handling Trump that will antagonize the soon-to-be U.S. president, Kuleba said that Europe's stance will be decisive.

    Leading European countries like the U.K., France, and Poland pledged to ramp up their support for Kyiv. The situation in Germany, Ukraine's largest European donor, remains uncertain as the country is heading toward snap elections in February.

    The ex-minister also complained that while Russia found allies willing to send their own troops, like North Korea, Kyiv's partners are unwilling to even commit sufficient weapons. Kuleba concluded that, unlike Russia and Ukraine, the West does not have a clear goal and does not know what it is fighting for.

    What we know about Trump’s plans for ending Russia’s war against UkraineTrump has repeatedly said he could end Russia’s war “in 24 hours.” What is his plan?Ex-Minister Kuleba skeptical about peace prospects during Trump's presidencyThe Kyiv IndependentChris YorkEx-Minister Kuleba skeptical about peace prospects during Trump's presidency
  • Russia raises 7 strategic bombers – Air Force

    Russia raises 7 strategic bombers – Air Force

    Russia raises 7 strategic bombers - Air Force

    The Ukrainian Air Force reported the take-off of 7 Russian Tu-95MS strategic bombers. The military urges not to ignore the air alarm signals.

    On the morning of November 28, the Air Force reported the take-off of Russian Tu-95MS strategic bombers from the Olenya airfield. This is reported by the Air Force, writes UNN.

    According to updated data, there are 7 Tu-95MS aircraft in the air. Don't ignore the air alarms!

    – the message says.

  • Biden administration won’t be able to send Ukraine all planned aid – WSJ

    Biden administration won’t be able to send Ukraine all planned aid – WSJ

    The Biden administration does not have enough time to provide Ukraine with all the military aid authorised by Congress before Biden’s presidency ends in January 2025, and some of the authority in this regard will be transferred to Donald Trump's team.

    Source: The Wall Street Journal, citing sources in the White House and the US Congress, as reported by European Pravda

    Details: The Biden administration has over US$6.5 billion to transfer equipment from US Army stocks and warehouses to Ukraine, and had hoped to use the entire amount before Biden’s term ends on 20 January 2025.

    However, according to the Wall Street Journal, the Pentagon says they have reached the amount of weaponry that can be sent to Ukraine each month without sacrificing their own fighting capability, and that there are logistical issues with getting munitions to Ukrainian forces.

    It is estimated that the United States would need to supply Ukraine with about US$110 million worth of weaponry per day – nearly US$3 billion in December and January – to use up all the funds. "It’s impossible," a WSJ source in Congress said.

    According to a Pentagon source, the US now intends to send US$500-750 million worth from its arsenal of weapons to Ukraine per month. Since larger equipment can take months to deliver, these supplies will primarily consist of artillery and ammunition, which are easier to transport.

    Any unused cash will be available to Donald Trump's future administration. What he will do about the shipment of weapons to Ukraine remains unknown.

    In addition to funding supplies from US Army stockpiles, the Biden administration has more than US$2 billion to fund long-term weapons contracts for Kyiv. They want to "get as much of that money as possible on contract" by 20 January, WSJ’s source in the Pentagon said.

    Additionally, Congress has allocated the White House just under US$5 billion to purchase more weapons to replenish American stockpiles. The Biden administration intends this money to be spent in full by the conclusion of Biden’s presidential term, the WSJ says.

    Background:

    • Earlier, it was reported that US President Joe Biden had asked Congress for an additional US$24 billion to provide military assistance to Ukraine and replace US weapons sent to Kyiv.
    • According to The Wall Street Journal, however, the future Congress, where Republicans will be in the majority, is lukewarm about this idea.

    Support UP or become our patron!

  • The US promises to provide Ukraine with everything it needs to fight Russia in 2025; the G7 works to finalize its $50B loan.

    The US promises to provide Ukraine with everything it needs to fight Russia in 2025; the G7 works to finalize its $50B loan.

    FinancePoliticsWar The US promises to provide Ukraine with everything it needs to fight Russia in 2025; the G7 works to finalize its $50B loan. Thursday, November 28, 2024 The US promises to provide Ukraine with everything it needs to fight Russia in 2025; the G7 works to finalize its $50B loan.

    US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken said that the G7 countries and their partners are determined to provide Ukraine with everything it needs to successfully conduct military operations in 2025 or hold peace talks with Russia from a position of strength. He stressed that the US continues to increase its military assistance to Ukraine in order to improve its defensive capabilities, particularly in the country’s east, where intense fighting continues. Separately, the official expressed concern about North Korean troops participating in the war on Russia’s behalf, noting that this aspect is of grave concern among the G7 countries. Blinken emphasized that Ukraine’s struggle has global significance: “Ukraine is fighting for us. It is fighting not only for itself; it is fighting for all of us.” Blinken also confirmed that the G7 countries are finalizing a $50B loan to Ukraine, secured by frozen Russian assets. The loan is planned to be provided by the end of this year.

  • Liverpool crush sorry Real Madrid as Conor Bradley puts Mbappe in his pocket and Mac Allister shines

    Liverpool crush sorry Real Madrid as Conor Bradley puts Mbappe in his pocket and Mac Allister shines

    Bradley Mbappe liverpool Real Madrid

    Conor Bradley destroyed Kylian Mbappe in every way and Alexis Mac Allister was a prime Luka Modric against the actual Luka Modric. Liverpool are good. Real Madrid are bad.

    Whether you love, hate or are indifferent towards Liverpool, we were all Conor Bradley. An academy lad who’s the most second of second fiddles in his position at the club, playing his first ever Champions League game against the reigning champions and champion of all champions, and he clears out the best footballer in the world – albeit The Artist Formerly Known As Kylian Mbappe on this showing and others this season – with a glorious man and ball challenge to produce the sort of roar from a crowd typically reserved for game-winning goals. Spine tingles and ‘ooofffss’ all round.

    It’s a sure red card if he gets it wrong but not having the time or headspace in an already fervent atmosphere to make a risk assessment worked in his and Liverpool’s favour, with his and his team’s level rising a couple of notches on the back of a tackle every fat dad bellowing from the stands or watching at home would loved to have made on a footballer we can all agree could do with a good (but fair) kicking once in a while.

    Bradley very nearly opened the scoring himself before playing a key role as the Reds deservedly took the lead. Alexis Mac Allister had played two similarly brilliant lofted passes in the first half to cause chaos in the Real Madrid defence and the best of the lot found Bradley’s perfectly-timed run in the 51st-minute, with Thibaut Courtois producing another excellent save to palm the full-back’s header away, having denied Darwin Nunez twice in the first half.

    Mac Allister was playing like a prime Luka Modric against a less-than prime Luka Modric. In a fraught, end-to-end, exhausting game in which neither team seemed able or even willing to try to string more than three or four passes together, the Argentinian had time and space on the ball, consistently made the right decisions and always looked the best bet to make the difference.

    He picked the ball up in the pocket in front of the Madrid defence, played a neat pass into Bradley, who acted as a wall on the right side of the box to pop the ball straight back into the midfielder, who took a touch and fired his shot into the far corner.

    Ally McCoist got a tad carried away with what we would suggest was a relatively simple first-time pass from Bradley to assist that goal, nicely weighted though it was, but the 21-year-old’s other contributions allow the frankly unbelievable thought to creep in that Liverpool might just be alright without the most talented right-back English football has ever seen.

    And it was hard to watch Mbappe consistently failing to release himself from the pocket of a full-back working as hard as Bradley without the ball and so effectively with it and think anything other than Liverpool would actually have been worse off with Trent Alexander-Arnold on the pitch in his place. Cue midfield transition chat…

    MORE LIVERPOOL FEATURES ON F365
    👉 Trent Alexander-Arnold ‘tarnished’ by Real Madrid move? Only by idiots…
    👉 Five next moves for Salah ranked on likelihood include leaving Liverpool for Barcelona
    👉 Culture wars, ref justice and how the league might look if Mo Salah didn’t exist

    We were utterly convinced we were going to go two for two in our penalty predictions. It was really poor from Andy Robertson to concede Madrid’s penalty, turning his back as Lucas Vasquez faked a cross, but after the game Mbappe had had, after the season he’s had, Coimhin Kelleher was always going to make what was a good (because penalty saves must always be called such) but comfortable save.

    As Mohamed Salah stepped up to take the penalty he won by turning Ferland Mendy inside out we were bracing ourselves for a Never In Doubt-like cliche from Darren Fletcher, before the Egyptian failed to even hit the target to remind us of an average penalty record that sees him miss one of every five (44 scored; 11 missed). For once this game wasn’t about him.

    There was next to no danger of a Madrid comeback anyway but Cody Gakpo put the game beyond doubt with quite the leap and header from a Robertson corner as defenders stood and watched.

    And while this is undoubtedly a Big Win for Liverpool, which maintains their 100 per cent record in the Champions League and all but secures their automatic qualification, this was a Madrid side well short of its best, both in terms of performance and personnel.

    No Vinicius Junior, no Rodrygo, no Eder Militao, no David Alaba, no Aurelien Tchouameni, no Dani Carvajal. That’s an injury list to rival that of Manchester City, who look set to feel the full force of Liverpool on Sunday. If winning is a hard habit to break, Arne Slot’s side are in 20-a-day territory right now. After the final whistle, Rio Ferdinand claimed – entirely reasonably for once – that “Liverpool are the team to beat in Europe right now”.

    There was also effectively no Mbappe, who likely had no idea who Conor Bradley was when he rocked up at Anfield. But having enjoyed nothing other than a faceful of turf courtesy of the full-back, he now knows exactly who Conor Bradley is.

  • Europe’s dreams of a flying taxi are crumbling due to lack of money: what’s going on with eVTOL

    Europe’s dreams of a flying taxi are crumbling due to lack of money: what’s going on with eVTOL

    Europe's dreams of a flying taxi are crumbling due to lack of money: what's going on with eVTOL

    The leading European developers of electric vertical take-off aircraft are facing financial problems. Lilium has declared bankruptcy, and Volocopter may come under the control of Chinese Geely.

    Leading European manufacturers developing electric aircraft with vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) have faced serious financial difficulties. Lilium has declared bankruptcy, and Volocopter is negotiating with Chinese Geely to sell 85% of its shares, the BBC reports, writes UNN.

    Details

    One of the innovations at the Olympic Games in Paris this year was supposed to be an electric flying taxi. The German company Volocopter has promised that its electric two-seater Velocity aircraft will carry passengers around the city. This never happened. Instead, the company conducted demonstration flights. Although non-compliance with this deadline was embarrassing, a more serious problem was playing out behind the scenes – Volocopter was urgently trying to attract new investments in order to save the company, the newspaper writes.

    Negotiations on a loan of 100 million euros from the government failed in April.

    Hopes are now pinned on China's Geely, which is in talks to acquire an 85% stake in Volocopter in exchange for $95 million in financing, according to a Bloomberg report. The deal could mean that all future production will be moved to China.

    Volocopter is one of dozens of companies around the world developing electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft (eVTOL).

    Their machines promise the flexibility of a helicopter, but without such cost, noise and emissions.

    However, faced with the huge costs of regulatory approval of such new aircraft and the subsequent increase in production capacity, some investors are abandoning them.

    Image

    One of the most high-profile "victims" is Lilium.

    A German company has developed a radical approach to the eVTOL theme.

    The Lilium aircraft uses 30 electric jets that can be tilted synchronously to transition from vertical lift to direct flight.

    The concept proved attractive, and the company said it had orders and memoranda of understanding for 780 aircraft from around the world.

    She was able to demonstrate the technology using a remotely controlled scale model. Construction of the first full-size aircraft has already begun, and testing was scheduled to begin in early 2025.

    Back at the Farnborough Airshow in July, Lilium's chief operating officer Sebastian Borel spoke confidently.

    "We are definitely burning money," he told the BBC. – But this is a good sign, because it means that we are producing an airplane. By the end of the year, we will have three aircraft in production, and we have also raised 1.5 billion euros.

    But then the money ran out.

    Lilium was trying to get a loan in the amount of 100 million euros from the German development bank KfW. However, this required guarantees from national and regional Governments, which were never implemented.

    In early November, the company began bankruptcy proceedings for its main operating businesses, and its shares were removed from the Nasdaq stock exchange.

    At the moment, work on the new aircraft continues as the company works with restructuring experts to sell the business or attract new investments. However, putting the new e-jet into production looks more difficult than ever.

    Image

    Vertical Aerospace is a major British player in the eVTOL market. The Bristol-based company was founded in 2016 by businessman Stephen Fitzpatrick, who also created OVOEnergy.

    Its striking V4 design uses eight large propellers mounted on thin airplane-type wings to create lift. Fitzpatrick made ambitious statements about the plane, suggesting that it would be "100 times" safer and quieter than a helicopter, for 20% of the cost.

    The company has made progress. After completing the remote-controlled test program, it began conducting manned tests earlier this year. Initially, they were conducted with an airplane tied to the ground. In early November, he carried out his first takeoff and landing without a leash.

    But there were also serious setbacks. Last August, a remotely piloted prototype was severely damaged when it crashed during tests at Cotswold Airport after a propeller blade fell off.

    In May, one of its key partners, the engineering giant Rolls Royce, backed out of a deal to supply electric motors for the aircraft.

    Ambitions remain sky-high. Vertical Aerospace says it will deliver 150 aircraft to its customers by the end of the decade. By that time, it also expects to produce 200 units per year and break even in monetary terms.

    But the company has run into financial difficulties and recently negotiated a rescue deal with its largest lender, the American company Mudrick Capital.

    As part of the deal, Mudrick will invest up to $50 million in Vertical, while $130 million of loans from Mudrick will be converted into shares.

    This will leave the American investment firm with a 70% stake in Vertical, while Fitzpatrick's stake will be reduced from 70% to 20%.

    Image

    Amid the turbulence, one European project is quietly going according to plan, says Bjorn Ferme, who has experience in aviation technology and pilots combat aircraft for the Swedish Air Force. He now works for the aerospace consulting company Leeham.

    He says the eVTOL project being implemented at Airbus is likely to survive.

    Named City Airbus NextGen, the four-seat aircraft has eight propellers and a flight range of 80 km.

    "This is a technology project for their engineers, they have the money and the knowledge," says Ferme.

    In other parts of the world, other well-funded startups can count on a good chance to put their aircraft into production. This will include Joby and Archer in the USA.

    After the planes are produced, the next task will be to check whether there is a profitable market for them.

    The first routes are likely to be between airports and urban centers. But will they make a profit?

    "The biggest problem in terms of operating costs is the pilot and batteries. The batteries need to be changed a couple of times a year," says Ferme.

    Given all the uncertainty and costs, as indicated, one may wonder why investors are investing in new electric aircraft at all.

    "No one wanted to miss out on the next Tesla," Ferme laughs.

  • The verdict in the fraud case involving Le Pen will be announced in March 2025

    The verdict in the fraud case involving Le Pen will be announced in March 2025

    The verdict in the fraud case involving Le Pen will be announced in March 2025

    A French court will announce a decision in the Marine Le Pen case on misuse of EU funds on March 31, 2025. The prosecutor's office demands to ban her from holding public office for 5 years.

    On March 31, 2025, a French court will announce a decision in the case of the leader of the right-wing party Marine Le Pen and her associates, who are accused of misuse of European Union funds. This decision could have far-reaching political consequences. This is reported by Reuters, writes UNN.

    Details

    It is noted that the prosecutor's office demands to ban Le Pen from holding public office for a period of five years, which may prevent her from participating in the 2027 presidential election. Her lawyer called it an"attack on democracy.

    Marine Le Pen, her party then known as the National Front, and former MPs and parliamentary assistants are accused of using funds intended to work in the European Parliament to pay workers who actually performed tasks for the party.

    Le Pen and her co-defendants deny the charges, arguing that the use of these funds was legitimate and consistent with a broader understanding of the duties of a parliamentary assistant.

    Le Pen's lawyer, Rudolf Bosselu, on the last day of the trial called the prosecutor's demand for an immediate ban on holding office "weapons of mass destruction against democracy." He stressed that this issue concerns not only Marine Le Pen, but also the 13 million voters who supported her in the previous elections.,

    – emphasizes the publication.

    Le Pen, who lost to Emmanuel Macron in the second round of the 2017 and 2022 presidential elections, is currently considered the main contender for the 2027 elections.

    In the event of a guilty verdict, the court may decide not to impose a ban on holding public office immediately, which will leave her a chance to participate in the elections.

    Le Pen later told reporters that after the trial is completed, she hopes that the judges will be convinced of the defense's arguments. She also stressed that the trial does not affect her position on the government of prime minister Michel Barnier, whom her party threatens to express no confidence in because of the budget for 2025.

    Recall

    The conviction of Marine Le Pen may deprive of her right to run in the 2027 presidential election and affect support for the "National Association".

  • Ukrainian soldiers repel attempted Russian attack in Zaporizhzhia sector, National Guard commander says

    Ukrainian soldiers repel attempted Russian attack in Zaporizhzhia sector, National Guard commander says

    Ukrainian soldiers repel attempted Russian attack in Zaporizhzhia sector, National Guard commander says

    Ukrainian soldiers repelled an attempted Russian offensive in the Zaporizhzhia sector, General Oleksandr Pivnenko, the commander of Ukraine's National Guard, said on Nov.27.

    In early October, Russian troops reportedly renewed their attack in the Zaporizhzhia sector. Kyiv warned of a potential Russian push in the southern region, saying Moscow was deploying trained assault groups to front-line positions in mid-November.

    Ukraine's Spartan Brigade aerial reconnaissance spotted Russian troops planning to attack the National Guard positions with an infantry group in advance, Pivnenko said, sharing footage showing the attack.

    He did not specify the scale of the attack or the number of Russian troops involved in the offensive.

    According to the commander, Russia is mostly trying to conduct assaults and reconnaissance attacks in the Zaporizhzhia sector with infantry groups consisting of 3 to 10 people.

    "The enemy rarely uses equipment," Pivnenko said. "But our soldiers destroy enemy personnel and firepower quickly and accurately."

    The Kyiv Independent could not verify these reports.

    President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Nov.25 that Ukraine "sees the existing threats" in the Zaporizhzhia sector.

    Russia is carrying out intense attacks in multiple sections of the eastern front, with attempts to break through Ukraine's defenses in Donetsk Oblast toward the towns of Pokrovsk and Kurakhove.

    Once liberated Kupiansk braces for worst as Russian troops approach, and future Western support looks uncertainVolodymyr paused his Sunday stroll from a shopping center in Kupiansk to take pictures of rubble from a Russian strike that almost killed his wife late last month. “It was broad daylight when they struck,” he said. “Our only luck was that my wife was in the kitchen, soUkrainian soldiers repel attempted Russian attack in Zaporizhzhia sector, National Guard commander saysThe Kyiv IndependentBoldizsar GyoriUkrainian soldiers repel attempted Russian attack in Zaporizhzhia sector, National Guard commander says
  • Joe Biden is preparing a пакет 725 million military aid package for Ukraine

    Joe Biden is preparing a пакет 725 million military aid package for Ukraine

    Joe Biden is preparing a пакет 725 million military aid package for Ukraine

    The Biden administration plans to provide Ukraine with військову 725 million in military assistance, including anti-tank weapons, mines and HIMARS. The package may be announced on Monday, but its content may change before signing.

    The administration of US President Joe Biden plans to provide Ukraine with a new package of military assistance in the amount of.725 million. This is reported by Reuters, reports UNN.

    Details

    The move is part of an effort to support Kiev ahead of Biden's presidential term in January. According to sources close to the plan, the package will include a variety of weapons aimed at deterring the offensive of Russian troops.:

    • anti-tank weapons,
    • mines,
    • drones,
    • Stinger Rockets,
    • ammunition for HIMARS systems,
    • cluster munitions that can be used in GMLRS missiles.

    It is expected that an official notification to the US Congress regarding this package will be received on Monday. However, the content and amount of the allowance may change by the time Joe Biden signs the document.

    The content and size of the package may change in the coming days before Biden's expected signature.

    This package will be the largest use of the presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA) for emergency withdrawal of weapons from US warehouses. Previously, such packages usually amounted to 1 125-250 million, but now Biden has access to another конгрес 4-5 billion of PDAs approved by Congress.

    recall

    The Biden administration has [6.5 billion to transfer weapons to Ukraine, but may not have time to use them before the end of the term. The Pentagon has reached the monthly supply limit and is experiencing logistical problems.