A coalition of 125 crypto and fintech organizations delivered a forceful rejection of banking business efforts to broaden the GENIUS Act’s prohibition on stablecoin yields, warning that broader restrictions would remove client selection whereas defending conventional banks from competitors.
The Blockchain Affiliation led the coalition in a letter to Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott and Rating Member Elizabeth Warren on Wednesday, arguing that makes an attempt to reinterpret the legislation’s yield ban characterize protectionism relatively than client safety.
“The push to limit stablecoin rewards past that agreed to in GENIUS just isn’t a technical refinement or a client safety repair,” the letter acknowledged.
“It could prohibit the identical kinds of incentive applications for stablecoin funds that banks have lengthy provided on bank cards and different kinds of cost companies.“
1/ At this time, we led a broad coalition of greater than 125 business leaders in a letter to Congress urging lawmakers to protect the rights enumerated within the GENIUS Act that guarantee america stays probably the most aggressive and modern capital market on the earth.
pic.twitter.com/nxZcNaJBTI
— Blockchain Affiliation (@BlockchainAssn) December 18, 2025
Banks Push Uneven Restrictions on Digital Funds
The dispute facilities on whether or not platforms like Coinbase and PayPal can supply rewards to stablecoin customers via loyalty applications and third-party incentives.
Whereas the GENIUS Act explicitly prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying curiosity on to holders, the coalition maintains that Congress intentionally preserved intermediaries’ capability to supply lawful rewards on the utility layer.
Banking teams led by the American Bankers Affiliation have urged Treasury to interpret “curiosity or yield” broadly sufficient to seize any financial profit, together with service provider reductions and platform rewards.
The coalition referred to as this enlargement “overtly protectionist,” noting that banks face no related restrictions on bank card rewards regardless of participating in riskier balance-sheet actions than GENIUS-regulated stablecoin issuers.
“With the federal funds fee at roughly 3.50–3.75%, common checking account yields stay close to 0.07% and financial savings accounts round 0.40%,” the letter famous.
“Stablecoin rewards applications allow platforms to share worth immediately with customers, serving to households profit from higher-rate environments relatively than absorbing losses to inflation.“

Coalition Disputes Financial institution Deposit Flight Claims
Banking associations have warned that stablecoin yields might set off deposit outflows resembling the Eighties cash market fund disaster, when withdrawals drained $32 billion from banks between 1981 and 1982.
Treasury estimates recommended yield-bearing stablecoins might lead to as much as $6.6 trillion in deposit flight.
The coalition firmly rejected these projections, citing Charles River Associates’ evaluation, which discovered no proof of disproportionate deposit outflows from neighborhood banks between 2019 and 2025.
The letter questioned how banks can declare deposit constraints whereas holding roughly $2.9 trillion in reserve balances, incomes curiosity on the Federal Reserve relatively than deploying them into loans.
“Opposition to stablecoin rewards displays safety of incumbent income fashions, not safety-and-soundness issues,” the coalition wrote, arguing that limiting third-party incentives would stop stablecoins from competing on a stage enjoying discipline with legacy cost programs.
Citi govt warns stablecoin curiosity funds might drain financial institution deposits just like the Eighties disaster amid GENIUS Act loophole issues.#Stablecoin #Bankshttps://t.co/aaHxz9bXHM
— Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) August 25, 2025
Regulatory Certainty and Market Competitors at Stake
Past client selection, the coalition warned that reopening the yield challenge earlier than GENIUS implementation begins would undermine the regulatory certainty that defines Congressional frameworks.
“It could sign that even not too long ago enacted compromises stay topic to virtually fast renegotiation, undermining the predictability that markets, shoppers, and innovators depend on,” the letter acknowledged.
The teams emphasised that rewards and incentives are commonplace aggressive instruments in markets with excessive community results and switching prices, together with the present funds market.
Stablecoins supply sooner settlement, decrease transaction prices, and larger transparency in comparison with conventional rails, however adoption requires incentives to beat entrenched consumer habits.
The signatories embody business leaders equivalent to Coinbase, PayPal, Stripe, Ripple, and Kraken, in addition to Stand With Crypto chapters throughout 20 states and funding companies equivalent to Andreessen Horowitz and Paradigm.
“Preserving the stability Congress struck is important to defending shoppers, fostering competitors, and guaranteeing that market construction laws can advance on a bipartisan and sturdy foundation,” the coalition concluded, urging lawmakers to reject any effort to broaden the yield prohibition past issuer funds.
The dispute comes as stablecoin adoption accelerates, with a circulation of $310 billion.
The market might triple to $1 trillion by 2026 as establishments combine blockchain funds into monetary infrastructure.
The submit 125 Crypto Teams Inform Congress Stablecoin Yield Ban Favors Large Banks appeared first on Cryptonews.


pic.twitter.com/nxZcNaJBTI
Citi govt warns stablecoin curiosity funds might drain financial institution deposits just like the Eighties disaster amid GENIUS Act loophole issues.#Stablecoin #Bankshttps://t.co/aaHxz9bXHM
Leave a Reply