Last news • War in Ukraine
Most Ukrainians help a 30-day ceasefire, however reject concessions to Russia – survey
Most Ukrainians help a 30-day ceasefire to indicate Russia's unwillingness for peace. On the identical time, Ukrainians are strongly towards any concessions to the aggressor.
Ukraine final week introduced the newest advance within the ongoing drone race with Russia, saying its new variant had the longest vary of any in its arsenal and had efficiently accomplished testing.
"Our drone with a 3,000-kilometer vary has handed testing," President Volodymyr Zelensky mentioned throughout his night tackle on March 17.
"I’m grateful to the builders and producers. We’re creating a line of long-range weapons that can assist assure the safety of our state," he added.
And that was it — there have been no additional particulars on the kind of drone, its identify, the dimensions of its warhead, or when it could go into mass manufacturing.
The droneFederico Borsari, a fellow on the Heart for European Coverage Evaluation (CEPA), informed the Kyiv Unbiased that it's probably the brand new drone has a fixed-wing construction and a turbojet engine.
"Just like a really low-cost cruise missile," he added.
If Borsari is appropriate, this could make it a longer-range model of Ukraine's Palianytsia missile drone, which was revealed final yr and is believed to have a spread of between 500 and 700 kilometers.
However a spread of three,000 kilometers opens up an unlimited expanse of Russia with a number of targets.
"That will create plenty of issues for Russia," Borsari mentioned.
The doable targetsFabian Hoffmann, a protection professional and doctoral analysis fellow on the College of Oslo, informed the Kyiv Unbiased that the longer vary will permit Ukraine to considerably develop its present drone marketing campaign, and he expects the kind of targets will stay the identical.
"Extra essential infrastructure, oil refineries, oil processing services," he mentioned, including: "The opposite factor that instantly involves thoughts is manufacturing services for numerous sorts of tools on the Russian aspect that most likely was outdoors of the goal radius of earlier drone programs."
To this point, Olenya army air base in Russia's Murmansk Oblast was the farthest Russian facility hit by a drone. The air base is positioned some 1,800 kilometers (1,118 miles) north of the Ukrainian border.
Whereas it's not identified what sort of drone was used within the assault, the minimal harm brought on and the very fact it has not been repeated since recommend it was a drone armed solely with a small warhead working on the very limits of its capabilities.
However the airbase is properly throughout the vary of Ukraine's new drone, as is the Severomorsk-1 naval air base simply to the north, residence to Russia's 216 Unbiased Unmanned Aerial Automobile Squadron and the 830th Unbiased Shipborne Anti-Submarine Helicopter Regiment.
Kyiv's ever-intensifying marketing campaign in opposition to Russia's power and army infrastructure to disrupt Moscow's battle effort will probably be bolstered, with a number of oil services throughout the 3,000-kilometer vary.
These embody the Strezhevsk and Nizhnevartovsk oil refineries, each positioned some 2,600 kilometers inside Russia.
Ukraine can also select to focus on Russian factories that contribute to Moscow's battle effort.
Inside vary is the JSC Serov Mechanical Plant in Sverdlovsk Oblast, which produces casings for 152 mm caliber projectiles and oil drilling and manufacturing tools for a number of main Russian oil corporations.
The manufacturing facility has been sanctioned by the U.S. and the EU.
The harm"The massive query, after all, is how giant is the warhead with all of the drone programs? As a result of that can, ultimately, actually decide the harm that it may do," Hoffman mentioned.
The bigger the warhead, the heavier the drone, and the extra restricted its vary, so Ukraine might have needed to make trade-offs to allow the three,000-kilometer vary.
However Hoffman mentioned that even with a small 20-kilogram warhead, the drone would nonetheless be efficient in opposition to unprotected targets resembling oil refineries the place a lot of the important equipment and flammable supplies are saved out within the open quite than underground or protected by hardened shelters.
"Oil and fuel infrastructure may be very prone even to small warheads," he mentioned.
"However if you wish to have a bit extra flexibility when it comes to what you’ll be able to goal, I believe we should always at the least hope for someplace round 100 kilograms, however I wouldn't be too optimistic about that."
The protectionUkraine does have one important benefit within the ongoing drone battle — Russia's insufficient air defenses.
"Russia has one of the crucial complete air protection networks on the planet, and but even they face a number of challenges in countering Ukrainian drones," Mattias Eken, a protection and safety professional at RAND Europe, informed the Kyiv Unbiased.
"The huge expanse of Russian territory and the distributed nature of army and power infrastructure make it tough to supply complete air protection protection with current Russian property."
Ukraine already repeatedly strikes targets essential to Russia's oil trade and protection capabilities — army air bases like Engels and refineries such that in Tuapse have been hit a number of instances, demonstrating Russian air defenses are already stretched skinny.
"Russia might want to prioritize which areas and property to defend, given the huge Russian geography, doubtlessly leaving some vulnerabilities in its infrastructure," Eken mentioned.
The Kyiv IndependentThe Kyiv Independent
Corrected enemy fireplace on Ukrainian items within the Kursk course: a "mole" of the Russian GRU has been detained
Navy counterintelligence of the SBU detained a GRU agent in Sumy area who was adjusting fireplace on Ukrainian items. The traitor was passing enemy coordinates for strikes on the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
In three years of full-scale battle towards Ukraine, 62% of corporations from international locations deemed "unfriendly" by Moscow have exited the Russian market, pro-Kremlin media outlet RBC reported on March 25, citing an audit by consulting agency Stored.
The evaluation lined over 300 international companies with "important property" and annual income of a minimum of 1 billion rubles ($12 million) in Russia. Of those, 183 corporations had absolutely withdrawn by the tip of 2024.
Most companies offered their property to Russian companies (103 instances) or native administration (40 instances). In 17 cases, international house owners withdrew from joint ventures with Russian companions, whereas 14 corporations shut down or suspended operations.
Firms from Northern Europe had the best exit charge, with 94% leaving Russia. Finland led with all 20 corporations within the pattern exiting, adopted by Sweden (13 out of 15), Norway, and Iceland (each 100%). Denmark lagged barely, with 74% of its companies having exited.
Exit charges amongst main Western economies diverse considerably. The U.S., Germany, France, and the U.Ok. noticed charges between 59-67%, whereas Canada, Australia, and New Zealand recorded a full 100% exit. In distinction, Austria had a 50% charge, Switzerland 38%, and Italy solely 22%.
The Kyiv IndependentTim Zadorozhnyy
For 96 corporations — a couple of third of the pattern — no exit data was obtainable, and most continued regular operations, the outlet wrote.
The statistics come amid efforts by Russian President Vladimir Putin to lure again Western companies. On Feb. 21, he instructed his Cupboard to arrange for his or her return whereas making certain "sure benefits" for Russian companies over re-entering international corporations.
Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, a whole lot of Western corporations have left, unwilling to contribute to the Russian financial system or battle effort.
In response to the Kyiv Faculty of Economics, 472 international companies have absolutely withdrawn, whereas one other 1,360 have scaled again operations.
Moscow has imposed strict exit situations, together with authorities approval, a compulsory 50% low cost on asset gross sales, and a ten% "exit tax." The Kremlin has additionally seized property from subsidiaries of Western companies that remained operational.
Regardless of these measures, some international companies have discovered methods to proceed operations in Russia or have quietly re-entered after a short lived pause.
The Kyiv IndependentTim Zadorozhnyy
The US State Division commented on the Russian strike on Sumy
State Division spokeswoman Tammy Bruce acknowledged that she condemns the impression on civilians on account of the Russian strike on Sumy. The US will proceed to work to stop fireplace in an effort to keep away from casualties.
Russian assaults throughout Ukraine killed no less than one civilian and injured no less than 110, together with kids, over the previous day, regional authorities reported on March 25.
Moscow's forces launched 139 assault and decoy drones towards Ukraine, in addition to an Iskander-M ballistic missile, the Air Pressure reported. Seventy-eight drones had been shot down, whereas 34 decoys disappeared from radars with out inflicting injury, in accordance with the assertion.
Russia launched a devastating missile assault towards the northeastern metropolis of Sumy on March 24, simply because the U.S. and Russia had been main ceasefire talks in Saudi Arabia.
Not less than 94 folks, together with 23 kids, had been injured, with most of them being hospitalized, the town council mentioned. Twenty-six buildings had been broken, together with colleges, a kindergarten, a hospital, and 16 residential buildings.
Three civilians had been injured in Russian assaults elsewhere in Sumy Oblast, in accordance with the regional navy administration.
In Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, a 36-year-old man was injured throughout Russian assaults towards the Synelnykove district, and a 40-year-old man was wounded within the Nikopol district, Governor Serhii Lysak mentioned.
One civilian was injured in a Russian assault towards Lyman in Donetsk Oblast, Governor Vadym Filashkin reported.
In Kherson Oblast, one particular person was killed and 6 injured in Russian strikes, Governor Oleksandr Prokudin mentioned. 4 homes had been broken.
In Poltava Oblast, drone particles began a hearth on the premises of an enterprise within the Myrhorod district, Governor Volodymyr Kohut mentioned. Two workers had been reported as injured, with one in all them being hospitalized.
A person and a girl had been injured in a Russian assault towards the Zaporizhzhia district, in accordance with Governor Ivan Fedorov.
The Kyiv IndependentThe Kyiv Independent
Normal Employees of the AFU confirmed the strike on the enemy's deployment location within the Kursk area
Ukrainian navy fully destroyed the item and eradicated as much as 30 occupiers within the Kursk area. This reduces the enemy's capacity to conduct fight operations within the Sumy and Kursk areas.
Ten years after Kyiv and Moscow first negotiated a ceasefire to finish the combating in Ukraine’s east, the 2 sides could as soon as once more discover themselves across the negotiating desk to achieve a truce on the battlefield.
This time round, Kyiv insists that any ceasefire alone is not going to be sufficient to ensure Ukraine’s safety if Russia’s full-scale invasion is dropped at an finish via peace negotiations.
After Russia invaded Ukraine’s jap Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts with the usage of proxy forces within the spring of 2014, a number of truces have been negotiated between 2014 and 2015 as a part of what grew to become often called the Minsk Course of, named for the town within the neighboring Belarus the place the talks happened.
France, Germany, and OSCE acted as mediators in negotiations between the Ukrainian authorities and the self-proclaimed impartial "republics," arrange and financed by Russia in Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts. Russia, a signatory to the agreements, positioned itself as a impartial dealer, whereas in reality being a celebration and the instigator of the battle.
However following each rounds of negotiations, known as Minsk-1 and a pair of, Russian-backed militants within the space violated the varied ceasefires dozens of occasions.
Nonetheless, Russia has constantly blamed Ukraine for failing to carry out the Minsk agreements. In 2022, Russia pronounced that the agreements “now not existed” and used it as one of many pretexts to launch the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Through the years, observers have argued that Ukraine, beneath strain from its worldwide companions and a deteriorating state of affairs on the battlefield, was compelled to signal an unfavorable deal in 2014 and a fair worse one in 2015.
Needing monetary assist from the West and time to construct up its navy, Ukraine felt it had no alternative however to signal the agreements. The pondering on the time was, based on then-International Minister Pavlo Klimkin, “If we don’t signal (the agreements), then what are we going to do?”
With contemporary reminiscences of this failed peace course of, President Volodymyr Zelensky has repeatedly said Ukraine wouldn’t settle for a negotiated finish to the invasion that doesn’t include agency safety ensures from companions.
The Kyiv IndependentAnastasiia Lapatina
Minsk-1: First try and signal a dealThe invasion of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts by Russian forces started in April 2014, when a number of dozen armed individuals led by Igor Girkin, additionally recognized by his alias "Igor Strelkov," a retired Federal Safety Service's (FSB) colonel, seized administrative buildings within the metropolis of Sloviansk.
Ukraine misplaced management of the Russian-Ukrainian border in Luhansk Oblast, via which Moscow provided weapons and gear.
Russia, which annexed Crimea earlier the identical 12 months, claimed that the armed battle in Donbas was an inner political affair of Ukraine attributable to the discontent of residents. Worldwide and Ukrainian monitoring our bodies, together with the Group for Safety and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), discovered proof suggesting in any other case.
Russian-backed militants acquired important reinforcements in August 2014, when the common Russian military joined them within the space of Ilovaisk and helped to encompass Ukrainian troops. Their encirclement resulted in what’s now often called the “Ilovaisk Tragedy” when Russian forces fired upon evacuating Ukrainian troops, regardless of the Russian aspect agreeing to a “inexperienced hall” to make sure their protected passage. 300 sixty Ukrainian troopers have been killed within the onslaught.
Amid heavy territorial and personnel losses, lower than two weeks later, on Sept. 5, 2014, Kyiv was compelled to sit down down on the negotiating desk throughout the Trilateral Contact Group, consisting of Ukraine, Russia, and OSCE officers. These talks led to the conclusion of the Minsk Protocol, also called Minsk-1, a 12-point doc geared toward establishing a ceasefire in Donbas.
The protocol included a direct bilateral cessation of the usage of weapons, making certain OSCE monitoring, the discharge of all hostages, the withdrawal of armed teams from Ukraine, and the adoption of a regulation on the particular standing of the occupied territories of Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts and the holding of early native elections there.
The doc was signed by the Particular Consultant of the OSCE Chairperson-in-Workplace Heidi Tagliavini, Ukraine's second President Leonid Kuchma, and then-Ambassador of Russia to Ukraine Mikhail Zurabov. Russian proxies Alexander Zakharchenko and Igor Plotnitsky, who represented the militants in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, additionally signed the protocol.
Throughout an extra spherical of talks on Sept. 19, the events additionally agreed on a nine-point memorandum that specified the truce phrases, together with a ban on navy plane flights over the agreed safety zone, the withdrawal of heavy weapons, and the withdrawal of international mercenaries, amongst different obligations.
"Possibly 1% of me believed that the Minsk Agreements would work. On the identical time, 99% have been positive that they’d not."
Whereas the settlement led to diminished combating, it did not carry an finish to hostilities, forcing the events again to the negotiating desk.
"Possibly 1% of me believed that the Minsk Agreements would work. On the identical time, 99% have been positive that they’d not," then-reconnaissance platoon commander Ruslan with the callsign "Spasatel" ("the savior" in English), who served close to Shyrokyne in Donetsk Oblast at the moment, instructed the Kyiv Unbiased. He’s recognized solely by his first title and callsign for safety causes.
The Kyiv IndependentKateryna Hodunova
Minsk-2 settlement: Ukraine compelled to signal a worse dealIn early 2015, Russian-backed troops from Donetsk Oblast captured the Donetsk Airport after months of extraordinarily heavy combating. Following its takeover, Russian-backed militants together with common Russian troops launched an assault on the strategically essential metropolis of Debaltseve, sitting between Donetsk and Luhansk
Ukraine, as soon as once more discovering itself in a weaker place on the battlefield and beneath strain from its European companions, agreed to a second spherical of talks in Minsk. Ukraine and Russia met for the second time on Feb. 11-12, 2015.
This time, the talks included an extended assembly of the Normandy Format, represented by then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French President Francois Hollande, and Russian President Vladimir Putin. For the primary time, the international locations' leaders met in Minsk — beforehand, the negotiations in Belarus had been held at a decrease degree.
"For them, it was a approach of creating us basically dependent (on Russia)."
The talks lasted practically 16 hours. Following the negotiations, the leaders agreed on a 13-point Bundle of Measures for implementing the brand new agreements. The Trilateral Contact Group signed it, and the Minsk-2 settlement was formally born.
In line with Minsk-2, a complete ceasefire needed to be declared on the entrance line beginning at midnight on Feb. 15, 2015. Not like the Minsk-1 agreements that created a buffer zone on the Russia-Ukraine border, beneath Minsk-2, the OSCE was supposed to observe the disengagement of weapons on the contact line, however entry was restricted.
Minsk-2 additionally included some extent on the self-governance of the Russian-occupied components of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts. Russia pushed for his or her recognition as autonomous areas to be enshrined in Ukraine’s structure.
"For them, it was a approach of creating us basically dependent (on Russia)," Klimkin, Ukraine’s international minister on the time, instructed the Kyiv Unbiased.
Minsk settlement instantly breaksInside minutes of the declaration of a complete ceasefire on Feb. 15, the OSCE recorded shelling of Ukrainian positions.
Three days later, over 2,500 Ukrainian troopers have been compelled to withdraw from Debaltseve. In line with Ukraine's Protection Ministry, 110 troopers have been killed, 270 wounded, seven have been captured, and 18 went lacking in Debaltseve from Jan. 15 till Feb. 18.
"The assaults didn’t cease. They only grew to become much less intense," then-reconnaissance platoon commander Ruslan, with the callsign "Spasatel," stated.
In the long run, Minsk Agreements did not cease the conflict, leaving the battle principally frozen. The paperwork signed in Minsk additionally have been by no means ratified by any parliament, giving them no actual authorized weight.
Even throughout the years between the Minsk Agreements and the full-scale invasion, the combating by no means absolutely stopped. A whole bunch of Ukrainian troopers have been killed throughout this era, together with some 65 troopers in 2021.
Recalling the agreements in 2022, Poroshenko stated that crucial factor then was to purchase time for Ukraine and decelerate Russia's advance within the east.
The Kyiv IndependentOleg Sukhov
"Our activity was, first, to avert the risk or at the least delay the conflict. To get eight years to revive financial progress and construct the power of the Armed Forces," Poroshenko stated. "It was achieved."
The OSCE, which was alleged to document ceasefire violations and conflict crimes, was typically refused entry to Russian-occupied territory by the Kremlin-backed militants. Ruslan, the Ukrainian soldier with the decision signal "Spasatel," recalled this peacekeeping mission as "completely ineffective" as a result of it operated primarily on the territory managed by Ukraine.
Paris and Berlin, in the meantime, have been extra preoccupied with avoiding any escalation with the Kremlin and deepening financial ties with Russia.
"Merkel launched the Nord Stream 2 fuel pipeline in 2015. Regardless of discussions with Ukraine and the EU, she stored repeating that it was simply 'an financial venture’," Klimkin stated.
"The logic then was: 'Let's cease (this conflict the place it’s) and attempt to cool down.' And far of the West believed on this logic," Klimkin added.
Later negotiations that happened beneath the Normandy Format in 2019, which facilitated a “complete” ceasefire signed on July 18, 2019, have been equally unsuccessful at curbing Russia’s aggression.
The final assembly of the format happened on Feb. 10, 2022, simply two weeks earlier than the beginning of Russia’s full-scale invasion on Feb. 24, 2022.
“The Energy Inside” — order the Kyiv Unbiased’s first-ever journal now. pre-order now 
The enemy has diminished the variety of missile carriers within the Black Sea – Ukrainian Navy
There may be 1 enemy ship with "Kalibrs" within the Black Sea. There are 4 enemy ships within the Mediterranean Sea, 3 of that are carriers of "Kalibr" cruise missiles, with a complete salvo of as much as 26 missiles.
In any negotiation, one of the vital highly effective weapons is information. In that regard, Steve Witkoff is willfully disarmed.
And it’s taking part in good for Russia.
The interview that Witkoff, Trump’s particular envoy, gave to Tucker Carlson a couple of days in the past revealed a fact that was perceived particularly bitterly right here in Ukraine:
Within the negotiation the place every little thing is at stake, Ukraine’s strongest ally is represented by a person who both is aware of subsequent to nothing about Ukraine or woefully misunderstands it. Furthermore, the ensuing vacuum is being full of the propaganda that Russians feed to him.
Observing it from Kyiv, figuring out that Witkoff is among the many folks deciding Ukraine’s future, was sobering and terrifying.
Though Witkoff, Donald Trump’s particular envoy to the Center East, wasn’t but formally appointed to guide the negotiations with Russia, informally he has sidelined the Russia envoy Keith Kellogg. It occurred resulting from his success brokering the ceasefire between Israel and Gaza — which has crumbled. One wonders if his method to the Center East deal was as devoid of factual information as his tactic with Russia is.
Within the interview, Witkoff revealed two key issues. One is his obvious infatuation with Russian President Vladimir Putin. No surprises there, because it seems to be a job requirement for anybody within the present U.S. administration.
Witkoff praised Putin for respecting Trump by ordering a portrait of him drawn by a famend Russian artist, and for praying for Trump following his assassination try.
He and Carlson contrasted it with President Volodymyr Zelensky’s “disrespectful” habits towards Trump through the notorious Oval Workplace assembly. “The conceitedness of small international locations!” Carlson quipped. “The ignorance of small males,” we’d wish to say again to him. (Right here’s our editorial about that assembly).
However after praising Putin, Witkoff moved on to disclose one thing even worse: His utter lack of awareness about Ukraine and the battle.
On the heart of this battle, Witkoff stated, is the destiny of “these so-called 4 areas.” He made an try to checklist them, solely to fail embarrassingly.
“Donbas, Crimea…” he began.
“Luhansk,” Carlson helpfully added.
“Sure, Luhansk!” Witkoff stated. “And two others.”
Neither of those two males who’ve sturdy opinions on Ukraine and Russia (and within the case of Witkoff — the facility to dictate their futures) even know the names of the embattled areas of Ukraine that Russia has pronounced theirs.
Right here’s a primer for Witkoff and Carlson. The 4 areas they have been attempting to recall are: Donetsk Oblast, Luhansk Oblast, Zaporizhizhia Oblast, and Kherson Oblast. “Oblast” is a area. Like a state, however with much less autonomy.
These areas have suffered the majority of Russian aggression, they’ve bled and misplaced numerous lives and cities. The least they deserve is for folks to recollect their names.
All 4 areas are partly occupied by Russia, however in two of them — Kherson and Zaporizhzhia — Ukraine controls the regional capitals. Donbas is an unofficial title of the area that encompasses each Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts. Crimea, which Witkoff tried to place in the identical line-up, is a separate entity, a fifth area. It was illegally annexed by Russia in 2014. The annexation wasn’t acknowledged by the worldwide group.
Nonetheless, the title confusion wasn't essentially the most regarding difficulty within the particular envoy’s interview.
On the subsequent flip, Witkoff stated that the areas have been “Russian-speaking” and “there have been referendums the place the overwhelming majority of the folks have indicated that they wish to be below Russian rule.”
This can be a harmful lie.
These statements intention to indicate that the partially occupied areas belong with Russia anyway — and due to this fact, ought to be simply given to Russia, no huge deal.
They’re among the many most frequent arguments Russia and its brokers have been utilizing to justify Russia’s claims on Ukraine — however listening to them from an individual with direct affect on the destiny of the battle is new, and worrying.
And what’s the truth? It’s true that many individuals in Ukraine, particularly in its japanese and southern areas, communicate Russian as their first language. They don’t seem to be ethnic Russians. They’re Ukrainians who communicate Russian because the consequence of lengthy years of eradication of the Ukrainian language, first by the Russian Empire, then by the Soviet Union, and its substitute with Russian. Nonetheless, they didn’t totally succeed, and even in essentially the most affected areas, folks typically communicate a mixture of two languages. The share of Ukrainian audio system has been rising since Russia’s assault in 2014, and extra so because the full-scale invasion in 2022, as folks select to modify to Ukrainian.
Importantly, for Russian-speaking Ukrainians the language isn’t a marker of political affiliation or allegiance. To place it merely, Ukrainians can communicate the Russian language and hate Russia on the identical time. There are Russian-speaking Ukrainian troopers preventing in opposition to Russia within the trenches.
Lastly, there are Ukrainians working on the Kyiv Impartial whose first language was Russian — and they’re far much less pro-Russian than some particular envoys.
The opposite Russian lie that Witkoff disturbingly indicators on to is the supposed “referendums” that the occupied areas held, the place “the overwhelming majority of the folks have indicated that they wish to be below Russian rule.”
There was no such vote. In September 2022, when Ukraine was on the offensive, Russia introduced so-called “referendums” within the occupied elements of 4 Ukrainian areas. It was a farce through which Ukrainians needed to vote at gunpoint (right here’s an instance of it). The Kremlin introduced, groundlessly, that 98% of the inhabitants “voted” to be part of Russia, and declared annexation. (Right here’s our editorial about it).
The validity of those sham referendums is acknowledged solely by North Korea — and now, apparently, by U.S. particular envoy Witkoff.
To contradict the result of the “referendum,” when lower than two months later the Ukrainian military liberated town of Kherson, hundreds of metropolis residents took to the streets in celebration. Since then, Russia has been attacking Kherson day by day, killing civilians within the metropolis they declare is theirs.
As Ukrainian journalists, we aren’t any strangers to correcting the misconceptions about Ukraine, or calling out Russian propaganda. However more and more so, we’re pressured to right misconceptions coming from the folks with direct affect on the destiny of our nation.
Watching Witkoff’s interview from wherever on the planet may be embarrassing. Watching it in Kyiv can also be horrifying.
For Ukrainians, every little thing is at stake on this battle — and in these negotiations. We already know the U.S. representatives will probably be rooting for Russia, not Ukraine. However Witkoff’s interview raises the query — can the sharp flip of U.S. international coverage be rooted in unimaginable ignorance?
The Kyiv IndependentThe Kyiv Independent