The advisor to the head of the OP criticizes the Western media for publications about forcing Ukraine to unfavorable negotiations with russia. Podolyak believes this is an incentive for the aggressor and a humiliation of international law.

Mykhailo Podolyak, advisor to the head of the Presidential Office, noted that Western media often publish stories about scenarios where the Ukrainian side is forced to negotiate peace with russia on terms unfavorable to Ukraine. He called it an incentive for russia to continue its aggression. UNN writes about this with a link to the advisor's post on the X network.

Forcing Ukraine to negotiate on any unfavorable terms (as the Western media constantly report) looks extremely strange

– the post says.

In his opinion, in this way they are trying to force Ukraine to give up resistance and do not discuss real scenarios for forcing russia, which is the aggressor, to stop this aggression and pay the maximum financial and legal price for the aggression.

What kind of absurd "moral imperative" is this – peace only at the expense of the victim, the country that was attacked. And at the expense of openly encouraging the aggressor to continue aggression, because there will be no cost for aggression? Where does this come from? And why should this strange construction lead to peace, and not to increased aggression and the ultimate humiliation of international law?

– He added.

Recall

President Zelenskyy stated that Ukraine is ready to consider real peace proposals from other countries. He called on Western officials to openly discuss the idea of exchanging territory for NATO membership.

As reported by The Telegraph, Donald Trump may call on European and British troops to provide an 800-mile (1,200-kilometer) buffer zone between the russian and Ukrainian armies as part of a plan to freeze the war between the two countries.

Ukraine expects further US leadership in achieving a just peace – SibigaNov 9 2024, 04:15 PM • 21401 view